netdev - Re: [PATCH 7/7] mac80211: Switch to new AEAD interface

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1433167519.3505.11.camel@sipsolutions.net>
Date:	Mon, 01 Jun 2015 16:05:19 +0200
From:	Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To:	Stephan Mueller <smueller@...onox.de>
Cc:	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
	Linux Crypto Mailing List <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>,
	Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] mac80211: Switch to new AEAD interface

On Mon, 2015-06-01 at 15:49 +0200, Stephan Mueller wrote:

> >The contents, now, that's a more interesting question. I believe it can
> >never be all zeroes, since association request frames are not
> >encrypted/protected and thus at least one byte in here must be non-zero.
> >The MAC addresses are also very likely non-zero, but technically
> >00:00:00:00:00:00 is a valid MAC address I believe.
> 
> So, even when having a malicious AP, that value is never zero? The driver of 
> the question is the following code in the patch set:
> 
> +       sg_set_buf(&sg[0], &aad[2], be16_to_cpup((__be16 *)aad));
> 
> ...
> 
> +       aead_request_set_crypt(aead_req, sg, sg, data_len, b_0);
> 
> ...
> 
>         crypto_aead_encrypt(aead_req);
> 
> 
> When I played around with the aead_request_set_crypt, I saw a crash in the 
> scatterlist handling of the crypto API when the first SGL entry has a zero 
> length.

Wait, I guess that's a *third* way for this to be "zero" a valid pointer
but zero length data?

Oh, no - you're referring to the CCM/GCM cases only, I guess, i.e. this
part:

-	sg_init_one(&assoc, &aad[2], be16_to_cpup((__be16 *)aad));
+	sg_set_buf(&sg[0], &aad[2], be16_to_cpup((__be16 *)aad));

I was looking at GMAC and that has a constant for the length :-)

Ok - here the length is kinda passed a part of the AAD buffer, but this
is really just some arcane code that should be fixed to use a proper
struct. The value there, even though it is __be16 and looks like it came
from the data, is actually created locally, see ccmp_special_blocks()
and gcmp_special_blocks().

johannes

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html