netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 0/3] s390/bpf: implement bpf_tail

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 01 Jun 2015 22:50:56 -0700
From:	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:	holzheu@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, schwidefsky@...ibm.com,
	heiko.carstens@...ibm.com, daniel@...earbox.net,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/3] s390/bpf: implement bpf_tail_call JIT support

On 5/31/15 9:39 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>
> Date: Sat, 30 May 2015 10:42:08 -0700
>
>> This set is for net-next tree.
>>
>> Patch 3 adds bpf_tail_call() support for s390x JIT. It has
>> a dependency on patches 1 and 2 that will also be submitted
>> to stable via Martin Schwidefsky.
>
> In this kind of scenerio, patches #1 and #2 should go via my
> tree (somehow), and then when I next merge 'net' into 'net-next'
> you can submit patch #3.

all makes sense. Just resubmitted #1 and #2 against 'net' with
proper 'Fixes' tag.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html