[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <556D52B9.1040004@roeck-us.net>
Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2015 23:52:41 -0700
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
CC: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Scott Feldman <sfeldma@...il.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
Jerome Oufella <jerome.oufella@...oirfairelinux.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...oirfairelinux.com,
Chris Healy <cphealy@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 2/9] net: dsa: add basic support for VLAN operations
On 06/01/2015 06:27 PM, Vivien Didelot wrote:
> This patch adds the glue between DSA and switchdev to add and delete
> SWITCHDEV_OBJ_PORT_VLAN objects.
>
> This will allow the DSA switch drivers implementing the port_vlan_add
> and port_vlan_del functions to access the switch VLAN database through
> userspace commands such as "bridge vlan".
>
> Signed-off-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>
> ---
> include/net/dsa.h | 7 +++++++
> net/dsa/slave.c | 61 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 2 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/net/dsa.h b/include/net/dsa.h
> index fbca63b..726357b 100644
> --- a/include/net/dsa.h
> +++ b/include/net/dsa.h
> @@ -302,6 +302,13 @@ struct dsa_switch_driver {
> const unsigned char *addr, u16 vid);
> int (*fdb_getnext)(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port,
> unsigned char *addr, bool *is_static);
> +
> + /*
> + * VLAN support
> + */
> + int (*port_vlan_add)(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port, u16 vid,
> + u16 bridge_flags);
> + int (*port_vlan_del)(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port, u16 vid);
> };
>
> void register_switch_driver(struct dsa_switch_driver *type);
> diff --git a/net/dsa/slave.c b/net/dsa/slave.c
> index cbda00a..52ba5a1 100644
> --- a/net/dsa/slave.c
> +++ b/net/dsa/slave.c
> @@ -363,6 +363,25 @@ static int dsa_slave_port_attr_set(struct net_device *dev,
> return ret;
> }
>
> +static int dsa_slave_port_vlans_add(struct net_device *dev,
> + struct switchdev_obj_vlan *vlan)
> +{
> + struct dsa_slave_priv *p = netdev_priv(dev);
> + struct dsa_switch *ds = p->parent;
> + int vid, err = 0;
> +
> + if (!ds->drv->port_vlan_add)
> + return -ENOTSUPP;
> +
> + for (vid = vlan->vid_start; vid <= vlan->vid_end; ++vid) {
> + err = ds->drv->port_vlan_add(ds, p->port, vid, vlan->flags);
> + if (err)
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + return err;
> +}
> +
> static int dsa_slave_port_obj_add(struct net_device *dev,
> struct switchdev_obj *obj)
> {
> @@ -378,6 +397,9 @@ static int dsa_slave_port_obj_add(struct net_device *dev,
> return 0;
>
> switch (obj->id) {
> + case SWITCHDEV_OBJ_PORT_VLAN:
> + err = dsa_slave_port_vlans_add(dev, &obj->u.vlan);
> + break;
> default:
> err = -ENOTSUPP;
> break;
> @@ -386,12 +408,34 @@ static int dsa_slave_port_obj_add(struct net_device *dev,
> return err;
> }
>
> +static int dsa_slave_port_vlans_del(struct net_device *dev,
> + struct switchdev_obj_vlan *vlan)
> +{
> + struct dsa_slave_priv *p = netdev_priv(dev);
> + struct dsa_switch *ds = p->parent;
> + int vid, err = 0;
> +
> + if (!ds->drv->port_vlan_del)
> + return -ENOTSUPP;
> +
> + for (vid = vlan->vid_start; vid <= vlan->vid_end; ++vid) {
> + err = ds->drv->port_vlan_del(ds, p->port, vid);
> + if (err)
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + return err;
> +}
> +
> static int dsa_slave_port_obj_del(struct net_device *dev,
> struct switchdev_obj *obj)
> {
> int err;
>
> switch (obj->id) {
> + case SWITCHDEV_OBJ_PORT_VLAN:
> + err = dsa_slave_port_vlans_del(dev, &obj->u.vlan);
> + break;
> default:
> err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
> break;
> @@ -473,6 +517,15 @@ static netdev_tx_t dsa_slave_notag_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb,
> return NETDEV_TX_OK;
> }
>
> +static int dsa_slave_vlan_noop(struct net_device *dev, __be16 proto, u16 vid)
> +{
> + /* NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_CTAG_FILTER requires ndo_vlan_rx_add_vid and
> + * ndo_vlan_rx_kill_vid, otherwise the VLAN acceleration is considered
> + * buggy (see net/core/dev.c).
> + */
As Scott mentioned, just don't set NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_CTAG_FILTER.
I don't entirely understand why we would not want to filter VLANs in the switch.
Can you explain ?
Thanks,
Guenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists