lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150602101522.GA2623@ares>
Date:	Tue, 2 Jun 2015 11:15:22 +0100
From:	Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@...onical.com>
To:	Junling Zheng <zhengjunling@...wei.com>
Cc:	Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>, Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, lizefan@...wei.com,
	viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, xuhanbing@...wei.com,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] net: socket: Fix the wrong returns for recvmsg and
 sendmsg

On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 03:05:57PM +0800, Junling Zheng wrote:
> On 2015/6/2 14:52, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 02:43:54PM +0800, Junling Zheng wrote:
> >> On 2015/6/2 14:27, Greg KH wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 10:23:57PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> >>>> From: Junling Zheng <zhengjunling@...wei.com>
> >>>> Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2015 12:05:32 +0800
> >>>>
> >>>>> So, the problem commit is 281c9c36 (net: compat: Update
> >>>>> get_compat_msghdr() to match copy_msghdr_from_user() behaviour),
> >>>>> which fixes db31c55a6fb2 and brings the get_compat_msghdr() in line
> >>>>> with copy_msghdr_from_user().
> >>>>
> >>>> Upstream this got fixed by:
> >>>>
> >>>> 08adb7dabd4874cc5666b4490653b26534702ce0
> >>>>
> >>>> So the part that makes us not unconditionally return -EFAULT needs
> >>>> to be backported, and that's probably equivalent to the patch
> >>>> your proposed which therefore should be applied.
> >>>
> >>> Ok, thanks, now applied.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Maybe other stable version also needs this fix:)
> > 
> > Yes, from what I'm seeing, at least 3.2 and 2.6.32 need it as well.
> > 
> 
> Yeah, all other stable versions *except 3.19 and 4.0* may need this fix:)

This seems to be correct.  I am queuing this fix for the 3.16 kernel
as well.  Thank you!

Cheers,
--
Luís
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ