[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1433361846.719897.286115305.0CA7D2AA@webmail.messagingengine.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2015 22:04:06 +0200
From: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
To: Andy Gospodarek <gospo@...ulusnetworks.com>,
Scott Feldman <sfeldma@...il.com>
Cc: Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, ddutt@...ulusnetworks.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: change fib behavior based on interface link
status
On Wed, Jun 3, 2015, at 20:27, Andy Gospodarek wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 11:15:55AM -0700, Scott Feldman wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 8:07 PM, Andy Gospodarek
> > <gospo@...ulusnetworks.com> wrote:
> > > This feature is only enabled with the new sysctl set (default is off):
> > > net.core.kill_routes_on_linkdown = 1
> >
> > One more thing, sorry. This feature is typically implemented today in
> > user-space on a per-interface basis. The example I'm thinking of is
> > Quagga's "link-detect" directive which goes on an interface. Should
> > this be a bool on each interface in systcl? That would let user not
> > enable on selected interfaces.
> That would not be my preference.
>
> I'm willing to investigate the per-namespace support if Hannes would
> like and add switchdev support for v2, but would prefer this not become
> that granular.
Actually, this idea also came to my mind: flagging specific routes if
they are eligible to suppress if the link is down.
Bye,
Hannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists