netdev - Re: [net-next RFC 08/14] openvswitch: Allocate & attach ip_tunnel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150603172935.2a019653@griffin>
Date:	Wed, 3 Jun 2015 17:29:35 +0200
From:	Jiri Benc <jbenc@...hat.com>
To:	Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, pshelar@...ira.com, jesse@...ira.com,
	davem@...emloft.net, daniel@...earbox.net, dev@...nvswitch.org,
	tom@...bertland.com, edumazet@...gle.com, jiri@...nulli.us,
	hannes@...essinduktion.org, marcelo.leitner@...il.com,
	stephen@...workplumber.org, jpettit@...ira.com, kaber@...sh.net
Subject: Re: [net-next RFC 08/14] openvswitch: Allocate & attach
 ip_tunnel_info for tunnel set action

On Mon,  1 Jun 2015 16:27:32 +0200, Thomas Graf wrote:
> --- a/net/openvswitch/flow.h
> +++ b/net/openvswitch/flow.h
> @@ -45,6 +45,11 @@ struct sk_buff;
>  #define TUN_METADATA_OPTS(flow_key, opt_len) \
>  	((void *)((flow_key)->tun_opts + TUN_METADATA_OFFSET(opt_len)))
>  
> +struct ovs_tunnel_info
> +{
> +	struct ip_tunnel_info	*info;
> +};

Why do you keep this structure? It doesn't seem it's useful.

 Jiri

-- 
Jiri Benc
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html