netdev - Re: netlink: Disable insertions/removals during rehash

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5570BBDF.3080309@roeck-us.net>
Date:	Thu, 04 Jun 2015 13:58:07 -0700
From:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:	herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, eric.dumazet@...il.com, tgraf@...g.ch,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: netlink: Disable insertions/removals during rehash

On 06/04/2015 11:59 AM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
> Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2015 09:27:27 -0700
>
>> sorry for bothering you - I don't see this patch in any of your trees,
>> and it is marked as "changes requested" in patchwork. Did I look
>> at the wrong places, do you still plan to apply the patch as-is,
>> or do you expect some changes ?
>>
>> As side info, I have been trying to track down the getaddrinfo
>> hang problem observed by others, which we see in 3.19.4 and 4.0.4.
>
> Changes-requested, amazingly, means that someone gave you feedback
> and changes along with a fresh resubmission is expected of you.
>

Yes, I understand. My problem is/was that your last e-mail on the subject
suggested that you would apply the patch, while at the same time patchwork
suggests that you expect to see changes. Sorry that I was - and still
am - unable to correlate those two pieces of information.

Guenter

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html