[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20150603.233829.1362177764562847830.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2015 23:38:29 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: sfeldma@...il.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, jiri@...nulli.us,
simon.horman@...ronome.com, makita.toshiaki@....ntt.co.jp
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] rocker: move netevent neigh update to
processes context
From: sfeldma@...il.com
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2015 20:43:28 -0700
> From: Scott Feldman <sfeldma@...il.com>
>
> v2:
>
> Changes based on review:
>
> - David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> raise problem with system_wq not
> preserving queue order to execution order. To fix, use driver-private
> ordered workqueue to preserve ordering of queued work.
>
> - Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us> small change on kfree of work queue item.
>
> v1:
>
> In review of Simon's patchset "rocker: transaction fixes". it was noted
> that rocker->neigh_tbl_next_index was unprotected in the call path below
> and could race with other contexts calling rocker_port_ipv4_neigh():
How it rocker->neigh_tbl_next_index not protected?
rocker->neigh_tbl_lock is _always_ held when it is accessed.
This patch, therefore, looks like completely unnecessary complexity
to me. Furthermore, I would completely prefer if the operation stays
completely synchronous to the call path where the neigh operation
occurs rather than throwing it out to a workqueue.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists