[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5570622A.8000407@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2015 23:35:22 +0900
From: Toshiaki Makita <toshiaki.makita1@...il.com>
To: Scott Feldman <sfeldma@...il.com>
CC: roopa <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>,
Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Toshiaki Makita <makita.toshiaki@....ntt.co.jp>,
Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Jiří Pírko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
"simon.horman@...ronome.com" <simon.horman@...ronome.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 5/5] rocker: remove support for legacy VLAN ndo
ops
On 15/06/04 (木) 15:05, Scott Feldman wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Jun 2015, Toshiaki Makita wrote:
>
>> Bridge's vlan_filtering is handled in master->op->foo(), not in
>> port->op->foo().
>> Can't we introduce another switchdev handler that performs MASTER
>> operation instead of calling SELF operation?
>>
>> br_afspec()
>> nbp_vlan_add()
>> netdev_switch_port_vlan_add()
>> rocker->ndo_switch_port_vlan_add() <- only used for MASTER operation
>>
>> I'm wondering why SELF operation (rocker->ndo_bridge_setlink()) does
>> what should be done in MASTER operation.
>
> Something like this:
This looks very close to what I'm suggesting, although I'm not sure if
we need switchdev_port_obj_add() to be exclusive with vlan_vid_add().
For rocker, keeping NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_[CTAG/STAG]_FILTER dropped makes
vlan_vid_add() essentially noop.
Toshiaki Makita
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists