netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH net] tcp: Update pcount after skb

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1433547904.1895.66.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
Date:	Fri, 05 Jun 2015 16:45:04 -0700
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>
Cc:	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Kernel Team <kernel-team@...com>,
	Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>,
	Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net] tcp: Update pcount after skb_pull() during mtu
 probing

On Fri, 2015-06-05 at 16:02 -0700, Martin KaFai Lau wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 02:23:55PM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > On Fri, 2015-06-05 at 11:02 -0700, Martin KaFai Lau wrote:
> > 
> > > tcp_trim_head() does not take the mss_now.
> > > Is it fine to have mss_now <= tcp_skb_mss(skb)? or we can depend on
> > > the tcp_init_tso_segs() in the tcp_write_xmit() to take care of it?
> > 
> > It should be fine : packets not yet sent have tcp_skb_pcount()==0,
> > so that tcp_init_tso_segs() can do the computation at the right time.
> hmm.... From tcp_write_xmit(), tcp_init_tso_segs() makes tcp_skb_pcount(skb) > 0
> but it may not be sent out immediately (like failing tcp_cwnd_test()).  Later,
> this skb is considered for tcp_mtu_probe(), sliced and forgot to update the
> pcount, I think.

Then clear pcount at this point, if this is a requirement.

Or else the test on !tso_segs seems quite lazy to me.

> 
> I am probably missing something.  Hence, I have a side question
> in tcp_init_tso_segs(),  should pcount be also recalculated if
> (tso_segs == 1 && mss_now < skb->len)?  Like this:
> 
> diff --git i/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c w/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
> index a369e8a..15d1c44 100644
> --- i/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
> +++ w/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
> @@ -1624,7 +1624,8 @@ static int tcp_init_tso_segs(const struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
>  {
>  	int tso_segs = tcp_skb_pcount(skb);
> 
> -	if (!tso_segs || (tso_segs > 1 && tcp_skb_mss(skb) != mss_now)) {
> +	if (!tso_segs || (tso_segs > 1 && tcp_skb_mss(skb) != mss_now) ||
> +	    (tso_segs == 1 && mss_now < skb->len)) {
>  		tcp_set_skb_tso_segs(sk, skb, mss_now);
>  		tso_segs = tcp_skb_pcount(skb);
>  	}


See above. Lets keep fast path as fast as possible ;)





--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html