netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] inet: add IP_BIND_ADDRESS_NO

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1433646482.29864.6.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
Date:	Sat, 06 Jun 2015 20:08:02 -0700
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>,
	Maciej Żenczykowski <maze@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] inet: add IP_BIND_ADDRESS_NO_PORT to overcome
 bind(0) limitations

On Sat, 2015-06-06 at 22:30 -0400, Neal Cardwell wrote:

> I like this a lot. This addresses a very serious gap in the sockets
> API, and should be very useful. The comment mentions that this is
> available for IPv6. From skimming the change I would have expected
> inet6_bind() would need a change analogous to the change in
> inet_bind()? Was there a missing "git add", or is a change to
> inet6_bind() somehow not needed?

Hmm... No I totally missed inet6_bind(), thanks for spotting this.

I'll add a IPv6 mode to my test program before sending a v2.

Thanks Neal.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html