[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5578AB3C.5020206@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 15:25:16 -0600
From: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To: sfeldma@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
CC: jiri@...nulli.us, bblanco@...mgrid.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] switchdev: fix BUG when port driver doesn't
support set attr op
On 6/10/15 2:56 PM, sfeldma@...il.com wrote:
> From: Scott Feldman <sfeldma@...il.com>
>
> Fix a BUG() where CONFIG_NET_SWITCHDEV is set but the driver for a bridged
> port does not support switchdec_port_attr_set op. Don't BUG() if
> -EOPNOTSUPP is returned.
>
> Signed-off-by: Scott Feldman <sfeldma@...il.com>
> Reported-by: Brenden Blanco <bblanco@...mgrid.com>
> ---
> net/switchdev/switchdev.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/switchdev/switchdev.c b/net/switchdev/switchdev.c
> index e008057..99bced4 100644
> --- a/net/switchdev/switchdev.c
> +++ b/net/switchdev/switchdev.c
> @@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ static void switchdev_port_attr_set_work(struct work_struct *work)
>
> rtnl_lock();
> err = switchdev_port_attr_set(asw->dev, &asw->attr);
> - BUG_ON(err);
> + BUG_ON(err && err != -EOPNOTSUPP);
> rtnl_unlock();
>
> dev_put(asw->dev);
>
Should that be WARN_ON instead of BUG_ON?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists