[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAE4R7bCy1bZ1A7tUNOA9H2GqwZhjWSqtjzs=GLxUUyNT_3+=gA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 19:12:33 -0700
From: Scott Feldman <sfeldma@...il.com>
To: Andy Gospodarek <gospo@...ulusnetworks.com>
Cc: Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, ddutt@...ulusnetworks.com,
Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>,
Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>,
"stephen@...workplumber.org" <stephen@...workplumber.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/3 v2] net: ipv4 sysctl option to ignore routes
when nexthop link is down
On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 11:47 PM, Andy Gospodarek
<gospo@...ulusnetworks.com> wrote:
> /* /proc/sys/net/ipv4/netfilter */
> diff --git a/kernel/sysctl_binary.c b/kernel/sysctl_binary.c
> index 7e7746a..c9d0a0e 100644
> --- a/kernel/sysctl_binary.c
> +++ b/kernel/sysctl_binary.c
> @@ -253,6 +253,7 @@ static const struct bin_table bin_net_ipv4_conf_vars_table[] = {
> { CTL_INT, NET_IPV4_CONF_NOPOLICY, "disable_policy" },
> { CTL_INT, NET_IPV4_CONF_FORCE_IGMP_VERSION, "force_igmp_version" },
> { CTL_INT, NET_IPV4_CONF_PROMOTE_SECONDARIES, "promote_secondaries" },
> + { CTL_INT, NET_IPV4_CONF_IGNORE_ROUTES_WITH_LINKDOWN, "ignore_routes_with_linkdown" },
Would "route_ignore_linkdown_nexthops" be a more accurate name? The
patch marks link-downed nexthops to be ignored, not the route,
correct?
s/NET_IPV4_CONF_IGNORE_ROUTES_WITH_LINKDOWN/NET_IPV4_CONF_ROUTE_IGNORE_LINKDOWN_NEXTHOPS
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists