[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5579A371.90101@cumulusnetworks.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 08:04:17 -0700
From: roopa <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>
To: Robert Shearman <rshearma@...cade.com>
CC: Scott Feldman <sfeldma@...il.com>, Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"ebiederm@...ssion.com" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Subject: Re: /net/mpls/conf/ethX//input duplicate entry
On 6/11/15, 5:55 AM, Robert Shearman wrote:
> On 11/06/15 00:23, Scott Feldman wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 2:58 PM, roopa <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>
>> wrote:
>>> On 6/10/15, 1:43 PM, Scott Feldman wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I'm getting this dump_stack when reloading rocker driver. Did some
>>>> sysctl MPLS nodes not get cleaned up on NETDEV_UNREGISTER?
>>>>
>>>> Steps to repro: load rocker (on system) with rocker device, rmmod
>>>> rocker, and then modprobe rocker. I doubt this is specific to rocker:
>>>> and re-registration of a netdev should hit it. I am using UDEV rules
>>>> to rename kernel's ethX to a different name. Maybe that's what
>>>> tripped it up?
>>>>
>>> On a quick look, wondering if this is because mpls driver does not
>>> seem to
>>> do a unregister and re-register sysctl
>>> on device name change.
>
> Mea culpa. Thanks for looking at this.
>
>>>
>>> diff --git a/net/mpls/af_mpls.c b/net/mpls/af_mpls.c
>>> index 7b3f732..ec21a5d 100644
>>> --- a/net/mpls/af_mpls.c
>>> +++ b/net/mpls/af_mpls.c
>>> @@ -564,6 +564,14 @@ static int mpls_dev_notify(struct
>>> notifier_block *this,
>>> unsigned long event,
>>> case NETDEV_UNREGISTER:
>>> mpls_ifdown(dev);
>>> break;
>>> + case NETDEV_CHANGENAME:
>>> + mpls_ifdown(dev);
>>> + if ((dev->type == ARPHRD_ETHER) ||
>>> + (dev->type == ARPHRD_LOOPBACK)) {
>>> + mdev = mpls_add_dev(dev);
>>> + if (IS_ERR(mdev))
>>> + return
>>> notifier_from_errno(PTR_ERR(mdev));
>>> + }
>>> }
>>> return NOTIFY_OK;
>>> }
>>
>> Roopa, I tested this patch and problem goes away. (It's missing a
>> break statement, BTW). I didn't look into the correctness of the
>> patch, but at first glance it seems liek the right thing to do. Maybe
>> breaking out the renaming portions into sub-functions could keep the
>> work done in NETDEV_CHANGENAME to a minimum.
>
> I agree that breaking out the sysctl registration/unregistration is a
> good idea to not have to do more work than is necessary, and to avoid
> unintended consequences (like routes using the interface being made
> unusable).
>
>>
>> Are you sending official fix?
>
> Roopa, let me know if you'd like me to carry this forward.
sorry for the delay in getting back. Its going to be a busy day for me.
And i don't know the side-effects of my changes yet.
you probably have a better handle on this. So if you can, yes please
carry this forward.
thanks!.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists