netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] bridge: make br_fdb_delete also check if the port matches

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20150610.215832.1573210091736777397.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Wed, 10 Jun 2015 21:58:32 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, stephen@...workplumber.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] bridge: make br_fdb_delete also check if the
 port matches

From: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com>
Date: Tue,  9 Jun 2015 03:34:13 -0700

> Before this patch the user-specified bridge port was ignored when
> deleting an fdb entry and thus one could delete an entry that belonged
> to any port.
> Example (eth0 and eth1 are br0 ports):
> bridge fdb add 00:11:22:33:44:55 dev eth0 master
> bridge fdb del 00:11:22:33:44:55 dev eth1 master
> (succeeds)
> 
> after the patch:
> bridge fdb add 00:11:22:33:44:55 dev eth0 master
> bridge fdb del 00:11:22:33:44:55 dev eth1 master
> RTNETLINK answers: No such file or directory
> 
> Based on a patch by Wilson Kok.
> 
> Reported-by: Wilson Kok <wkok@...ulusnetworks.com>
> Signed-off-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com>

Applied, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html