[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAE4R7bAnPDA_S=tjaM-qLbb4ZM0_FcTPQH6jC7_Mgmc==1c6wA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 23:07:28 -0700
From: Scott Feldman <sfeldma@...il.com>
To: Andy Gospodarek <gospo@...ulusnetworks.com>
Cc: Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, ddutt@...ulusnetworks.com,
Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>,
Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>,
"stephen@...workplumber.org" <stephen@...workplumber.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/3 v3] net: track link-status of ipv4 nexthops
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 7:37 PM, Andy Gospodarek
<gospo@...ulusnetworks.com> wrote:
> Add a fib flag called RTNH_F_LINKDOWN to any ipv4 nexthops that are
> reachable via an interface where carrier is off. No action is taken,
> but additional flags are passed to userspace to indicate carrier status.
Andy, it seems now RTNH_F_LINKDOWN and RTNH_F_DEAD are very similar
and I'm wondering if this could be done without introducing a new flag
and just use RTNH_F_DEAD. The link change event would set RTNH_F_DEAD
on nh on dev link down, and clear on link up. The sysctl knob would
be something like "nexthop_dead_on_linkdown", default off. So
basically expanding the ways RTNH_F_DEAD can be set. That would
simplify the patch set quite a bit and require no changes to iproute2.
-scott
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists