netdev - Re: [PATCH 4/7] slub: fix error path bug in kmem_cache_alloc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20150616145109.5bbe850094519072d33e9047@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Tue, 16 Jun 2015 14:51:09 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
Cc:	linux-mm@...ck.org, Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] slub: fix error path bug in kmem_cache_alloc_bulk

On Mon, 15 Jun 2015 17:52:26 +0200 Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com> wrote:

> The current kmem_cache/SLAB bulking API need to release all objects
> in case the layer cannot satisfy the full request.
> 
> If __kmem_cache_alloc_bulk() fails, all allocated objects in array
> should be freed, but, __kmem_cache_alloc_bulk() can't know
> about objects allocated by this slub specific kmem_cache_alloc_bulk()
> function.

Can we fold patches 2, 3 and 4 into a single patch?

And maybe patch 5 as well.  I don't think we need all these
development-time increments in the permanent record.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html