[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5581DA83.9060504@cumulusnetworks.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 13:37:23 -0700
From: roopa <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>
To: Scott Feldman <sfeldma@...il.com>
CC: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] ipv4: include NLM_F_APPEND flag in append
route notifications
On 6/17/15, 11:30 AM, Scott Feldman wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 11:07 AM, Roopa Prabhu
> <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com> wrote:
>> From: Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>
>>
>> This patch adds NLM_F_APPEND flag to struct nlmsg_hdr->nlmsg_flags
>> in newroute notifications if the route add was an append.
>> (This is similar to how NLM_F_REPLACE is already part of new
>> route replace notifications today)
>>
>> This helps userspace determine if the route add operation was
>> an append.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>
>> ---
>> v2: flip if condition around append and change |= to =
>> (feedback from Alexander Duyck and Scott Feldman)
> Is this a bug fix for net, or a new feature for net-next? Regardless,
>
> Acked-by: Scott Feldman <sfeldma@...il.com>
I could not decide between net and net-next.
....but the patch applies cleanly against net if Dave decides to pick it
up for net.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists