[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150617082531.33eb524c@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 08:25:31 +0200
From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>, brouer@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] slub: fix error path bug in kmem_cache_alloc_bulk
On Tue, 16 Jun 2015 14:51:09 -0700
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Jun 2015 17:52:26 +0200 Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> > The current kmem_cache/SLAB bulking API need to release all objects
> > in case the layer cannot satisfy the full request.
> >
> > If __kmem_cache_alloc_bulk() fails, all allocated objects in array
> > should be freed, but, __kmem_cache_alloc_bulk() can't know
> > about objects allocated by this slub specific kmem_cache_alloc_bulk()
> > function.
>
> Can we fold patches 2, 3 and 4 into a single patch?
>
> And maybe patch 5 as well. I don't think we need all these
> development-time increments in the permanent record.
I agree. I'll fold them when submitting V2
--
Best regards,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer
MSc.CS, Sr. Network Kernel Developer at Red Hat
Author of http://www.iptv-analyzer.org
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists