[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5581893E.3070609@cumulusnetworks.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 07:50:38 -0700
From: roopa <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>
To: Scott Feldman <sfeldma@...il.com>
CC: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] ipv4: include NLM_F_APPEND flag in append route notifications
On 6/17/15, 12:50 AM, Scott Feldman wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 9:11 AM, Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com> wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
>> @@ -1203,6 +1204,8 @@ int fib_table_insert(struct fib_table *tb, struct fib_config *cfg)
>>
>> if (!(cfg->fc_nlflags & NLM_F_APPEND))
>> fa = fa_first;
>> + else
>> + nlflags |= NLM_F_APPEND;
>> }
> The if and else parts above don't seem logically related.
I have it at this place because here is where the decision to append
really happens.
> Maybe you
> could initialize nlflags as:
>
> unsigned int nlflags = cfg->fc_nlflags & (NLM_F_REPLACE|NLM_F_APPEND);
>
> And then pass rtmsg_fib(..., nlflags) to avoid the flag test/set?
nlflags should only contain NLM_F_REPLACE and NLM_F_APPEND if a replace or
append really took place. Hence the check and setting of nlflags is at
the place where that
decision is made.
I had tried this patch a couple of other ways.... Do you think the below
would be less confusing ?
thanks.
diff --git a/net/ipv4/fib_trie.c b/net/ipv4/fib_trie.c
index 3c699c4..9bfa3d8 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/fib_trie.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/fib_trie.c
@@ -1082,6 +1082,7 @@ int fib_table_insert(struct fib_table *tb, struct
fib_config *cfg)
struct trie *t = (struct trie *)tb->tb_data;
struct fib_alias *fa, *new_fa;
struct key_vector *l, *tp;
+ unsigned int nlflags = 0;
struct fib_info *fi;
u8 plen = cfg->fc_dst_len;
u8 slen = KEYLENGTH - plen;
@@ -1189,8 +1190,9 @@ int fib_table_insert(struct fib_table *tb, struct
fib_config *cfg)
fib_release_info(fi_drop);
if (state & FA_S_ACCESSED)
rt_cache_flush(cfg->fc_nlinfo.nl_net);
+ nlflags |= NLM_F_REPLACE;
rtmsg_fib(RTM_NEWROUTE, htonl(key), new_fa, plen,
- tb->tb_id, &cfg->fc_nlinfo, NLM_F_REPLACE);
+ tb->tb_id, &cfg->fc_nlinfo, nlflags);
goto succeeded;
}
@@ -1201,7 +1203,9 @@ int fib_table_insert(struct fib_table *tb, struct
fib_config *cfg)
if (fa_match)
goto out;
- if (!(cfg->fc_nlflags & NLM_F_APPEND))
+ if (cfg->fc_nlflags & NLM_F_APPEND)
+ nlflags |= NLM_F_APPEND;
+ else
fa = fa_first;
}
err = -ENOENT;
@@ -1238,7 +1242,7 @@ int fib_table_insert(struct fib_table *tb, struct
fib_config *cfg)
rt_cache_flush(cfg->fc_nlinfo.nl_net);
rtmsg_fib(RTM_NEWROUTE, htonl(key), new_fa, plen, new_fa->tb_id,
- &cfg->fc_nlinfo, 0);
+ &cfg->fc_nlinfo, nlflags);
succeeded:
return 0;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists