netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 00/15] Simplify netfilter and network namespaces

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.11.1506182210240.1659@ja.home.ssi.bg>
Date:	Thu, 18 Jun 2015 22:21:15 +0300 (EEST)
From:	Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>
To:	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 00/15] Simplify netfilter and network
 namespaces


	Hello,

On Thu, 18 Jun 2015, Eric W. Biederman wrote:

> My incremental patch for ipvs on top of everything else I have pushed
> out looks like this:
> 
> From: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
> Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2015 18:34:12 -0500
> Subject: [PATCH] ipvs: Pass struct net down to where it is needed and used
> 
> Pass struct net down to where it is used and stop guessing
> which network namespace should be used.

	At first look patch is ok. But I'm not sure
for the changes in ip_vs_xmit.c. Can you explain in
2-3 lines, when can we see different netns? Is it when
packet is forwarded to output device and it is part from
another netns?

	I'm asking because these __ip_vs_get_out_rt*
calls in ip_vs_xmit.c can reroute packet to another
device...

	Also, skb_sknet is another candidate for removal.
But I can take care about it after your changes are
pushed...

Regards

--
Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html