[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <558432F1.5040209@brocade.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2015 16:19:13 +0100
From: Robert Shearman <rshearma@...cade.com>
To: Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>, <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
<tgraf@...g.ch>
CC: <davem@...emloft.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next RFC v2 2/3] ipv4: add support for light weight
tunnel encap attributes
On 19/06/15 05:49, Roopa Prabhu wrote:
> From: Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>
>
> Introduces two netlink attributes RTA_ENCAP_TYPE and
> RTA_ENCAP to support attaching encap information to ipv4 routes.
Surely RTA_ENCAP_TYPE should be part of RTA_ENCAP, since the type
doesn't make sense without the data and vice versa?
>
> RTA_ENCAP is a nested attribute as suggested by Thomas
> (and also as Robert had it in his series). RTA_ENCAP
> netlink policy is declared by the light weight tunnel
> drivers that support this encap type.
>
> fib code calls the following for each nexthop:
> - new route handler:
> lwt build state (that parses RTA_ENCAP and returns
> lwt state that lives in every fib_nh)
> - del dump hanlder:
> lwt release handler to release lwt state data
> - route dump hanlder:
> lwt dump encap to fill RTA_ENCAP data
> - during input route lookup
> sets dst->output to lwtunnel_output which
> in turn calls the corresponding lwt tunnel
> output function which applies the required
> encap and xmits the packet
>
> Signed-off-by: Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>
Thanks,
Rob
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
Powered by blists - more mailing lists