netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 05/12] net/mlx5e: Poll rx cq before tx cq to improve round-trip latency

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <55896966.80704@mellanox.com>
Date:	Tue, 23 Jun 2015 17:12:54 +0300
From:	Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, <achiad.mellanox@...il.com>
CC:	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <amirv@...lanox.com>,
	<talal@...lanox.com>, <saeedm@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 05/12] net/mlx5e: Poll rx cq before tx cq to
 improve round-trip latency

On 6/22/2015 4:35 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: achiad shochat <achiad.mellanox@...il.com>
> Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 00:35:37 +0300
>
>> Hello Dave,
>>
>> In mlx5 the RX processing is broken down into two stages:
>> 1) Hand to kernel SKBs of completed RX packets - @mlx5e_poll_rx_cq()
>> 2) Allocate and post to HW new RX buffers - @mlx5e_post_rx_wqes()
>>
>> Would handling of TX completions in between stages (1) and (2) be OK?
> I would do all of TX processing first and synchronously.  It's very
> cheap and makes lots of resources available for RX processing.

So we'll drop this patch.

Or.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html