[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55897509.8010205@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2015 00:02:33 +0900
From: Toshiaki Makita <toshiaki.makita1@...il.com>
To: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
CC: vyasevich@...il.com, bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [Bridge] [PATCH net-next] bridge: vlan: flush the dynamically
learned entries on port vlan delete
On 15/06/23 (火) 21:28, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
> Add a new argument to br_fdb_delete_by_port which allows to specify a
> vid to match when flushing entries and use it in nbp_vlan_delete() to
> flush the dynamically learned entries of the vlan/port pair when removing
> a vlan from a port. Before this patch only the local mac was being
> removed and the dynamically learned ones were left to expire.
> Note that the do_all argument is still respected and if specified, the
> vid will be ignored.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com>
> ---
> note: There are 2 warnings, the C99 comment was already there and the 81
> char line is the prototype and I think it looks better this way.
> One unclear thing is about vid 0, I see that it can be passed to
> nbp_vlan_(add|delete) although the comment says it shouldn't.
nbp_vlan_add() should not be called with vid 0 because vid 0 of fdb
entries is internally used when vlan_filtering is disabled, and such
entries are exposed to userspace as those without any vlan id.
bridge's vlan_filtering is respecting 802.1Q-2011 spec, which says vid 0
cannot be used as a normal vlan id.
If vlan 0 can be added, it should be a bug.
Toshiaki Makita
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists