[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.11.1506301520180.1799@denkbrett>
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 15:24:58 +0200 (CEST)
From: Sebastian Ott <sebott@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>
cc: Eran Ben Elisha <eranbe@...lanox.com>,
Jack Morgenstein <jackm@....mellanox.co.il>,
Hadar Hen Zion <hadarh@...lanox.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: mlx4: "failed to allocate default counter port 1"
On Tue, 30 Jun 2015, Or Gerlitz wrote:
> On 6/30/2015 1:45 PM, Sebastian Ott wrote:
> > [ 88.909558] mlx4_slave_cmd op=3840, ret=-22, status=3
> > [ 88.909562] mlx4_core 0000:00:00.0: mlx4_allocate_default_counters:
> > failed to allocate default counter port 1 err -22
> > [ 88.909564] mlx4_core 0000:00:00.0: Failed to allocate default counters,
> > aborting
> > [ 88.961735] mlx4_core: probe of 0000:00:00.0 failed with error -22
>
> Do you run the VF on the same system/kernel as the PF, or the VF is probed to
> VM which runs the latest kernel and the PF runsolder kernel (which?)
The latter case. The PF is driven by a much older Kernel running OFED
2.3.2.0.0.1
> Can you also hook the PF code that serves this flow to see where we actually
> fail? basically, we should be going this way mlx4_ALLOC_RES_wrapper -->
> counter_alloc_res -- so I'd like to see which of the branches in
> counter_alloc_res fails...
Nope, I don't have direct access to the PF, sry.
Sebastian
>
> Or.
>
>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists