[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <D1C050BB.47A5%brakmo@fb.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2015 22:40:17 +0000
From: Lawrence Brakmo <brakmo@...com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Kernel Team <Kernel-team@...com>,
Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next] tcp: add NV congestion control
On 7/3/15, 9:47 AM, "David Miller" <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
>From: Lawrence Brakmo <brakmo@...com>
>Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2015 18:21:24 -0700
>
>> This is a request for comments.
>>
>> TCP-NV (New Vegas) is a major update to TCP-Vegas. An earlier version of
>> NV was presented at 2010's LPC (slides). It is a delayed based
>> congestion avoidance for the data center. This version has been tested
>> within a 10G rack where the HW RTTs are 20-50us.
>>
>> A description of TCP-NV, including implementation and experimental
>> results, can be found at:
>> http://www.brakmo.org/networking/tcp-nv/TCPNV.html
>>
>> The current version includes many module parameters to support
>> experimentation with the parameters.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Lawrence Brakmo <lawrence@...kmo.org>
>
>I'm disappointed in the skb->cb[] size increase, like Eric. This
>severely negatively impacts everyone on every Linux system in the
>world, not just people using NV.
>
>The performance implications from increasing sk_buff by even 1 byte in
>size are absolutely non-trivial.
I will look into Neal¹s comment regarding using a union in the skb->cb[]
so I don¹t have to increase skb->cb[] size.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists