[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20150708.135055.1728112231079036434.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2015 13:50:55 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: edumazet@...gle.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, ast@...mgrid.com, jhs@...atatu.com,
john.fastabend@...il.com, edumazet@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 0/7] net_sched: act: lockless operation
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2015 05:18:02 -0700
> As mentioned by Alexei last week in Budapest, it is a bit weird
> to take a spinlock in order to drop a packet in a tc filter...
>
> Lets add percpu infra for tc actions and use it for gact & mirred.
>
> Before changes, my host with 8 RX queues was handling 5 Mpps with gact,
> and more than 11 Mpps after.
>
> Mirred change is not yet visible if ifb+qdisc is used, as ifb is
> not yet multi queue enabled, but is a step forward.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Series applied, thanks Eric.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists