netdev - Re: [PATCH 1/2] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: add write access to debugfs regs file

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <268315096.110637.1436389979563.JavaMail.zimbra@savoirfairelinux.com>
Date:	Wed, 8 Jul 2015 17:12:59 -0400 (EDT)
From:	Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>
To:	Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc:	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, David <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	kernel <kernel@...oirfairelinux.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: add write access to debugfs
 regs file

Hi Andrew,

----- On Jul 8, 2015, at 4:53 PM, Andrew Lunn andrew@...n.ch wrote:

> On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 04:36:18PM -0400, Vivien Didelot wrote:
>> Allow write access to the regs file in the debugfs interface, with the
>> following parameters:
>> 
>>     echo <name> <reg> <value> > regs
>> 
>> Where "name" is the register name (as shown in the header row), "reg" is
>> the register address (as shown in the first column) and "value" is the
>> 16-bit value. e.g.:
>> 
>>     echo GLOBAL 1a 5550 > regs
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>  1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx.c b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx.c
>> index 8c130c0..04e6eb6 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx.c
>> @@ -1648,6 +1648,35 @@ static int mv88e6xxx_regs_show(struct seq_file *s, void
>> *p)
>>  	return 0;
>>  }
>>  
>> +static ssize_t mv88e6xxx_regs_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf,
>> +				    size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
>> +{
>> +	struct seq_file *s = file->private_data;
>> +	struct dsa_switch *ds = s->private;
>> +	struct mv88e6xxx_priv_state *ps = ds_to_priv(ds);
>> +	char name[count];
> 
> Is this safe? Is count somehow limited? If i was to echo 8K to the
> file would i not exceed the kernel stack space?
> 
>      Andrew

I thought it was. But maybe 32 is a better value here. I'll resend these
two patches with char name[32] instead, tomorrow.

Thanks for your time,
-v
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html