[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJwzM1kvWfP1VB4wUoT74F-Ons1R3cpoBEAdfm37sh1p5vhh+A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2015 14:55:39 -0700
From: Avinash Patil <avinashapatil@...il.com>
To: Nicholas Mc Guire <hofrat@...dl.org>
Cc: Amitkumar Karwar <akarwar@...vell.com>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
"linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Nishant Sarmukadam <nishants@...vell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mwifiex: drop condition with no effect
Hi Nicholas,
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 7:15 AM, Nicholas Mc Guire <hofrat@...dl.org> wrote:
> scanning for trivial bug-patters with coccinelle spatches returned:
> ./drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/sta_cmdresp.c:895
> WARNING: condition with no effect (if branch == else)
>
> originally added in 'commit d8d2f19feb16 ("mwifiex: silence TDLS link
> delete failure for nonexistent link")' with dev_dbg/dev_err (though
> with the same message) to differentiate severity and then in 'commit
> acebe8c10a6e ("mwifiex: change dbg print func to mwifiex_dbg")' all
> dev_dbg,dev_warn and dev_err got converted to mwifiex_dbg which should
> thus probably drop this if/else as well.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Mc Guire <hofrat@...dl.org>
> ---
>
> If dropping the if/else is not the right thing to do then commit
> acebe8c10a6e "mwifiex: change dbg print func to mwifiex_dbg" probably
> needs a review as well.
>
> Patch was compile tested with x86_64_defconfig + CONFIG_MWIFIEX=m
>
> Patch is against 4.2-rc1 (localversion-next is -next-20150708)
>
> drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/sta_cmdresp.c | 11 +++--------
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/sta_cmdresp.c b/drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/sta_cmdresp.c
> index b645884..e58f900 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/sta_cmdresp.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/sta_cmdresp.c
> @@ -892,14 +892,9 @@ static int mwifiex_ret_tdls_oper(struct mwifiex_private *priv,
> switch (action) {
> case ACT_TDLS_DELETE:
> if (reason) {
> - if (!node || reason == TDLS_ERR_LINK_NONEXISTENT)
> - mwifiex_dbg(priv->adapter, ERROR,
> - "TDLS link delete for %pM failed: reason %d\n",
> - cmd_tdls_oper->peer_mac, reason);
> - else
> - mwifiex_dbg(priv->adapter, ERROR,
> - "TDLS link delete for %pM failed: reason %d\n",
> - cmd_tdls_oper->peer_mac, reason);
> + mwifiex_dbg(priv->adapter, ERROR,
> + "TDLS link delete for %pM failed: reason %d\n",
> + cmd_tdls_oper->peer_mac, reason);
I think reason why we had these 2 different prints is for first
occurrence in "if" which may be not so serious we used to print with
dev_dbg and second occurrence in "else" is more serious issue which
was under dev_err.
It would be better to use mwifiex_dbg with DBG/MSG in"if" condition
instead of removing whole if/else.
> } else {
> mwifiex_dbg(priv->adapter, MSG,
> "TDLS link delete for %pM successful\n",
> --
> 1.7.10.4
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists