netdev - [PATCH 3/7] netfilter: arptables: use percpu jumpstack

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed,  8 Jul 2015 11:48:16 +0200
From:	Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
To:	netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/7] netfilter: arptables: use percpu jumpstack

From: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>

commit 482cfc318559 ("netfilter: xtables: avoid percpu ruleset duplication")

Unlike ip and ip6tables, arp tables were never converted to use the percpu
jump stack.

It still uses the rule blob to store return address, which isn't safe
anymore since we now share this blob among all processors.

Because there is no TEE support for arptables, we don't need to cope
with reentrancy, so we can use loocal variable to hold stack offset.

Fixes: 482cfc318559 ("netfilter: xtables: avoid percpu ruleset duplication")
Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
---
 net/ipv4/netfilter/arp_tables.c |   25 ++++++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv4/netfilter/arp_tables.c b/net/ipv4/netfilter/arp_tables.c
index 95c9b6e..92305a1 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/netfilter/arp_tables.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/netfilter/arp_tables.c
@@ -254,9 +254,10 @@ unsigned int arpt_do_table(struct sk_buff *skb,
 	static const char nulldevname[IFNAMSIZ] __attribute__((aligned(sizeof(long))));
 	unsigned int verdict = NF_DROP;
 	const struct arphdr *arp;
-	struct arpt_entry *e, *back;
+	struct arpt_entry *e, **jumpstack;
 	const char *indev, *outdev;
 	const void *table_base;
+	unsigned int cpu, stackidx = 0;
 	const struct xt_table_info *private;
 	struct xt_action_param acpar;
 	unsigned int addend;
@@ -270,15 +271,16 @@ unsigned int arpt_do_table(struct sk_buff *skb,
 	local_bh_disable();
 	addend = xt_write_recseq_begin();
 	private = table->private;
+	cpu     = smp_processor_id();
 	/*
 	 * Ensure we load private-> members after we've fetched the base
 	 * pointer.
 	 */
 	smp_read_barrier_depends();
 	table_base = private->entries;
+	jumpstack  = (struct arpt_entry **)private->jumpstack[cpu];
 
 	e = get_entry(table_base, private->hook_entry[hook]);
-	back = get_entry(table_base, private->underflow[hook]);
 
 	acpar.in      = state->in;
 	acpar.out     = state->out;
@@ -312,18 +314,23 @@ unsigned int arpt_do_table(struct sk_buff *skb,
 					verdict = (unsigned int)(-v) - 1;
 					break;
 				}
-				e = back;
-				back = get_entry(table_base, back->comefrom);
+				if (stackidx == 0) {
+					e = get_entry(table_base,
+						      private->underflow[hook]);
+				} else {
+					e = jumpstack[--stackidx];
+					e = arpt_next_entry(e);
+				}
 				continue;
 			}
 			if (table_base + v
 			    != arpt_next_entry(e)) {
-				/* Save old back ptr in next entry */
-				struct arpt_entry *next = arpt_next_entry(e);
-				next->comefrom = (void *)back - table_base;
 
-				/* set back pointer to next entry */
-				back = next;
+				if (stackidx >= private->stacksize) {
+					verdict = NF_DROP;
+					break;
+				}
+				jumpstack[stackidx++] = e;
 			}
 
 			e = get_entry(table_base, v);
-- 
1.7.10.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html