[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <559EBC91.2070600@broadcom.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2015 20:25:21 +0200
From: Arend van Spriel <arend@...adcom.com>
To: Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@...opsys.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
CC: <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Brett Rudley <brudley@...adcom.com>,
"Franky (Zhenhui) Lin" <frankyl@...adcom.com>,
Hante Meuleman <meuleman@...adcom.com>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
Pieter-Paul Giesberts <pieterpg@...adcom.com>,
Daniel Kim <dekim@...adcom.com>,
<linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
<brcm80211-dev-list@...adcom.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] brcmfmac: dhd_sdio.c: use existing atomic_or primitive
On 07/09/2015 10:13 AM, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> There's already a generic implementation so use that instead.
There is or there was? If there is now I am fine with this patch, but if
it already was there the author might have had a reason for adding a
local function and I would like to hear that reason.
> ---
> I'm not sure if the driver usage of atomic_or?() is correct in terms of
> storage size of @val for 64 bit arches.
>
> Assuming LP64 programming model for linux on say x86_64: atomic_or()
> callers in this driver use long (sana 64 bit) storage and pass it to
> atomic_orr/atomic_or which downcasts it to 32 bits. Is that OK ?
The function is used with 32bit register value from the device so I
think it is ok.
Regards,
Arend
> ---
> Cc: Brett Rudley <brudley@...adcom.com>
> Cc: Arend van Spriel <arend@...adcom.com>
> Cc: "Franky (Zhenhui) Lin" <frankyl@...adcom.com>
> Cc: Hante Meuleman <meuleman@...adcom.com>
> Cc: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
> Cc: Pieter-Paul Giesberts <pieterpg@...adcom.com>
> Cc: Daniel Kim <dekim@...adcom.com>
> Cc: linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: brcm80211-dev-list@...adcom.com
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@...opsys.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@...opsys.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.c | 13 ++-----------
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.c b/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.c
> index d36f5f3d931b..f990e3d0e696 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.c
> @@ -2564,15 +2564,6 @@ static inline void brcmf_sdio_clrintr(struct brcmf_sdio *bus)
> }
> }
>
> -static void atomic_orr(int val, atomic_t *v)
> -{
> - int old_val;
> -
> - old_val = atomic_read(v);
> - while (atomic_cmpxchg(v, old_val, val | old_val) != old_val)
> - old_val = atomic_read(v);
> -}
> -
> static int brcmf_sdio_intr_rstatus(struct brcmf_sdio *bus)
> {
> struct brcmf_core *buscore;
> @@ -2595,7 +2586,7 @@ static int brcmf_sdio_intr_rstatus(struct brcmf_sdio *bus)
> if (val) {
> brcmf_sdiod_regwl(bus->sdiodev, addr, val, &ret);
> bus->sdcnt.f1regdata++;
> - atomic_orr(val, &bus->intstatus);
> + atomic_or(val, &bus->intstatus);
> }
>
> return ret;
> @@ -2712,7 +2703,7 @@ static void brcmf_sdio_dpc(struct brcmf_sdio *bus)
>
> /* Keep still-pending events for next scheduling */
> if (intstatus)
> - atomic_orr(intstatus, &bus->intstatus);
> + atomic_or(intstatus, &bus->intstatus);
>
> brcmf_sdio_clrintr(bus);
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists