netdev - Re: Fighting out-of-order reception with RPS?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 09 Jul 2015 10:48:22 +0200
From:	Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>
To:	Holger Schurig <holgerschurig@...il.com>
CC:	"list@...ke-m.de:NETWORKING DRIVERS" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	therbert.google.com@...r.kernel.org,
	"linux-can@...r.kernel.org" <linux-can@...r.kernel.org>,
	sunil.kovvuri@...il.com, jonathon.reinhart@...il.com
Subject: Re: Fighting out-of-order reception with RPS?

On 09.07.2015 08:34, Holger Schurig wrote:
>> and has to be done by hand depending on where the CAN interfaces
>> are attached to the system.
>
> No ...  udev rules rock!   :-)
>

Yeah. But it can not be the approach to fix a known problem in the kernel by 
urging people to make workarounds in userspace. For my testing I did it by 
hand. But in real life the kernel has to do 'the right thing' by having wise 
defaults without interaction.

Regards,
Oliver
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html