netdev - [PATCH -next 3/6] netfilter: Simply the tests for enabling and disabling the ingress queue hook

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 10 Jul 2015 18:13:58 -0500
From:	ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To:	Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
Cc:	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
	Juanjo Ciarlante <jjciarla@...z.uncu.edu.ar>,
	Wensong Zhang <wensong@...ux-vs.org>,
	Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>,
	Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>,
	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
	Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@...ckhole.kfki.hu>,
	Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
	Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>,
	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [PATCH -next 3/6] netfilter: Simply the tests for enabling and disabling the ingress queue hook


Replace an overcomplicated switch statement with a simple if statement.

This also removes the ingress queue enable outside of nf_hook_mutex as
the protection provided by the mutex is not necessary and the code is
clearer having both of the static key increments together.

Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
---
 net/netfilter/core.c | 17 ++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/netfilter/core.c b/net/netfilter/core.c
index a0e54974e2c9..7e3bc12f1c62 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/core.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/core.c
@@ -74,7 +74,6 @@ int nf_register_hook(struct nf_hook_ops *reg)
 		if (reg->hooknum == NF_NETDEV_INGRESS) {
 			BUG_ON(reg->dev == NULL);
 			nf_hook_list = &reg->dev->nf_hooks_ingress;
-			net_inc_ingress_queue();
 			break;
 		}
 #endif
@@ -90,6 +89,10 @@ int nf_register_hook(struct nf_hook_ops *reg)
 	}
 	list_add_rcu(&reg->list, elem->list.prev);
 	mutex_unlock(&nf_hook_mutex);
+#ifdef CONFIG_NETFILTER_INGRESS
+	if ((reg->pf == NFPROTO_NETDEV) && (reg->hooknum == NF_NETDEV_INGRESS))
+		net_inc_ingress_queue();
+#endif
 #ifdef HAVE_JUMP_LABEL
 	static_key_slow_inc(&nf_hooks_needed[reg->pf][reg->hooknum]);
 #endif
@@ -102,18 +105,10 @@ void nf_unregister_hook(struct nf_hook_ops *reg)
 	mutex_lock(&nf_hook_mutex);
 	list_del_rcu(&reg->list);
 	mutex_unlock(&nf_hook_mutex);
-	switch (reg->pf) {
-	case NFPROTO_NETDEV:
 #ifdef CONFIG_NETFILTER_INGRESS
-		if (reg->hooknum == NF_NETDEV_INGRESS) {
-			net_dec_ingress_queue();
-			break;
-		}
-		break;
+	if ((reg->pf == NFPROTO_NETDEV) && (reg->hooknum == NF_NETDEV_INGRESS))
+		net_dec_ingress_queue();
 #endif
-	default:
-		break;
-	}
 #ifdef HAVE_JUMP_LABEL
 	static_key_slow_dec(&nf_hooks_needed[reg->pf][reg->hooknum]);
 #endif
-- 
2.2.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html