[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55A40BF7.7060803@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 16:05:27 -0300
From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, nhorman@...driver.com
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org, vyasevich@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] sctp: SCTP_SOCKOPT_PEELOFF return socket pointer
for kernel users
On 13-07-2015 15:59, David Miller wrote:
> From: Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
> Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 06:39:11 -0400
>
>> Initially Marcelo had created duplicate code paths, one to return an
>> fd, one to return a file struct. If you would rather go in that
>> direction, I'm sure he can propose it again, but that seems less
>> correct to me than this solution.
>
> That's much better.
I'm not sure what you mean. Is the new option better or the
history/description?
Marcelo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists