[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20150714.153422.914759715820927338.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 15:34:22 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: ast@...mgrid.com
Cc: daniel@...earbox.net, jhs@...atatu.com, jiri@...nulli.us,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] tc: fix tc actions in case of shared skb
From: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 15:26:46 -0700
> On 7/13/15 1:55 PM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
>> On 07/13/2015 10:17 PM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
>> ...
>>> We cannot check tc actions from pktgen, since they can be added
>>> dynamically.
>>> So I see three options:
>>> 1 get rid of burst hack for both RX and TX in pktgen (kills
>>> performance)
#1 is a serious consideration if you don't come up with better ideas,
since an optimization is for nothing if it knowingly breaks things.
>>> 2 add unlikely(skb_shread) check to few tc actions
>>> 3 do nothing
> ...
>> pktgen case. :/ With regards to option 2, you could hide that behind
>> a static inline helper wrapped in IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NET_PKTGEN), but
>> that is a veeeery ugly workaround/hack as well (and distros might
>> even ship it nevertheless).
>
> naming such helper is a headache as well.
> static inline bool is_pktgen_shared_skb(struct sk_buff *skb)
> {
> #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NET_PKTGEN)
As mentioned by others, this ifdef accomplishes nothing as indeed
every distribution turns pktgen on so %99.9999 of all users will not
benefit from this optimized check.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists