netdev - Re: [PATCH net] bonding: fix destruction of bond with devices different from arphrd

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55A6CA20.8050609@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:	Wed, 15 Jul 2015 16:01:20 -0500
From:	Carol Soto <clsoto@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@...ckwall.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	j.vosburgh@...il.com, gospo@...ulusnetworks.com, vfalico@...il.com,
	ebiederm@...ssion.com, davem@...emloft.net,
	Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] bonding: fix destruction of bond with devices
 different from arphrd_ether



On 7/15/2015 2:52 PM, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
> From: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com>
>
> When the bonding is being unloaded and the netdevice notifier is
> unregistered it executes NETDEV_UNREGISTER for each device which should
> remove the bond's proc entry but if the device enslaved is not of
> ARPHRD_ETHER type and is in front of the bonding, it may execute
> bond_release_and_destroy() first which would release the last slave and
> destroy the bond device leaving the proc entry and thus we will get the
> following error (with dynamic debug on for bond_netdev_event to see the
> events order):
> [  908.963051] eql: event: 9
> [  908.963052] eql: IFF_SLAVE
> [  908.963054] eql: event: 2
> [  908.963056] eql: IFF_SLAVE
> [  908.963058] eql: event: 6
> [  908.963059] eql: IFF_SLAVE
> [  908.963110] bond0: Releasing active interface eql
> [  908.976168] bond0: Destroying bond bond0
> [  908.976266] bond0 (unregistering): Released all slaves
> [  908.984097] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [  908.984107] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1787 at fs/proc/generic.c:575
> remove_proc_entry+0x112/0x160()
> [  908.984110] remove_proc_entry: removing non-empty directory
> 'net/bonding', leaking at least 'bond0'
> [  908.984111] Modules linked in: bonding(-) eql(O) 9p nfsd auth_rpcgss
> oid_registry nfs_acl nfs lockd grace fscache sunrpc crct10dif_pclmul
> crc32_pclmul crc32c_intel ghash_clmulni_intel ppdev qxl drm_kms_helper
> snd_hda_codec_generic aesni_intel ttm aes_x86_64 glue_helper pcspkr lrw
> gf128mul ablk_helper cryptd snd_hda_intel virtio_console snd_hda_codec
> psmouse serio_raw snd_hwdep snd_hda_core 9pnet_virtio 9pnet evdev joydev
> drm virtio_balloon snd_pcm snd_timer snd soundcore i2c_piix4 i2c_core
> pvpanic acpi_cpufreq parport_pc parport processor thermal_sys button
> autofs4 ext4 crc16 mbcache jbd2 hid_generic usbhid hid sg sr_mod cdrom
> ata_generic virtio_blk virtio_net floppy ata_piix e1000 libata ehci_pci
> virtio_pci scsi_mod uhci_hcd ehci_hcd virtio_ring virtio usbcore
> usb_common [last unloaded: bonding]
>
> [  908.984168] CPU: 0 PID: 1787 Comm: rmmod Tainted: G        W  O
> 4.2.0-rc2+ #8
> [  908.984170] Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011
> [  908.984172]  0000000000000000 ffffffff81732d41 ffffffff81525b34
> ffff8800358dfda8
> [  908.984175]  ffffffff8106c521 ffff88003595af78 ffff88003595af40
> ffff88003e3a4280
> [  908.984178]  ffffffffa058d040 0000000000000000 ffffffff8106c59a
> ffffffff8172ebd0
> [  908.984181] Call Trace:
> [  908.984188]  [<ffffffff81525b34>] ? dump_stack+0x40/0x50
> [  908.984193]  [<ffffffff8106c521>] ? warn_slowpath_common+0x81/0xb0
> [  908.984196]  [<ffffffff8106c59a>] ? warn_slowpath_fmt+0x4a/0x50
> [  908.984199]  [<ffffffff81218352>] ? remove_proc_entry+0x112/0x160
> [  908.984205]  [<ffffffffa05850e6>] ? bond_destroy_proc_dir+0x26/0x30
> [bonding]
> [  908.984208]  [<ffffffffa057540e>] ? bond_net_exit+0x8e/0xa0 [bonding]
> [  908.984217]  [<ffffffff8142f407>] ? ops_exit_list.isra.4+0x37/0x70
> [  908.984225]  [<ffffffff8142f52d>] ?
> unregister_pernet_operations+0x8d/0xd0
> [  908.984228]  [<ffffffff8142f58d>] ?
> unregister_pernet_subsys+0x1d/0x30
> [  908.984232]  [<ffffffffa0585269>] ? bonding_exit+0x23/0xdba [bonding]
> [  908.984236]  [<ffffffff810e28ba>] ? SyS_delete_module+0x18a/0x250
> [  908.984241]  [<ffffffff81086f99>] ? task_work_run+0x89/0xc0
> [  908.984244]  [<ffffffff8152b732>] ?
> entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x16/0x75
> [  908.984247] ---[ end trace 7c006ed4abbef24b ]---
>
> Thus remove the proc entry manually if bond_release_and_destroy() is
> used. Because of the checks in bond_remove_proc_entry() it's not a
> problem for a bond device to change namespaces (the bug fixed by the
> Fixes commit) but since commit
> f9399814927ad ("bonding: Don't allow bond devices to change network
> namespaces.") that can't happen anyway.
>
> Reported-by: Carol Soto <clsoto@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com>
> Fixes: a64d49c3dd50 ("bonding: Manage /proc/net/bonding/ entries from
>                        the netdev events")
> ---
>   drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 1 +
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> index 317a49480475..ec1404ec4d2f 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> @@ -1916,6 +1916,7 @@ static int  bond_release_and_destroy(struct net_device *bond_dev,
>   		bond_dev->priv_flags |= IFF_DISABLE_NETPOLL;
>   		netdev_info(bond_dev, "Destroying bond %s\n",
>   			    bond_dev->name);
> +		bond_remove_proc_entry(bond);
>   		unregister_netdevice(bond_dev);
>   	}
>   	return ret;
Tested-by: Carol L Soto <clsoto@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html