[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGg4U=EZPSNTCAi6bxnOhY1BxUkNyzFK70ukUASm1wJuE_bvfw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 11:12:14 +0300
From: Marian Corcodel <corcodel.marian@...il.com>
To: Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next]r8169: Serialise some operations from open close
This it.On me rtl 8101/8102 start now an full duplex with maximum
speed , some times need to restart autoneg in order to start .After
mutex_init access on main structure(struct rtl8169_private) have only
on mutex_lock , mutex_unlock.
2015-07-15 2:40 GMT+03:00 Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>:
> Corcodel Marian <corcodel.marian@...il.com> :
> [...]
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169.c
>> index 410c1ee..be67873 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169.c
>> @@ -7555,11 +7555,13 @@ static int rtl8169_close(struct net_device *dev)
>>
>> rtl_lock_work(tp);
>> clear_bit(RTL_FLAG_TASK_ENABLED, tp->wk.flags);
>> -
>> - rtl8169_down(dev);
>> rtl_unlock_work(tp);
>>
>> + rtl8169_down(dev);
>> + //rtl_unlock_work(tp);
>> + rtl_lock_work(tp);
>> cancel_work_sync(&tp->wk.work);
>> + rtl_unlock_work(tp);
>>
>> free_irq(pdev->irq, dev);
>
> tab/spaces mix. Stray commented code.
>
> rtl_lock_work/cancel_work_sync/rtl_unlock_work makes no sense.
>
> [...]
>> @@ -7611,10 +7614,12 @@ static int rtl_open(struct net_device *dev)
>> if (retval < 0)
>> goto err_free_rx_1;
>>
>> + rtl_lock_work(tp);
>> INIT_WORK(&tp->wk.work, rtl_task);
>> -
>> + rtl_unlock_work(tp);
>> smp_mb();
>
> ?
>
> Irq has not been requested : this code isn't racing with NAPI.
>
> I don't see either how it could race with a runtime resume handler.
>
> Care to elaborate what it is supposed to race with ?
>
>>
>> + rtl_lock_work(tp);
>> rtl_request_firmware(tp);
>>
>> retval = request_irq(pdev->irq, rtl8169_interrupt,
>> @@ -7623,7 +7628,7 @@ static int rtl_open(struct net_device *dev)
>> if (retval < 0)
>> goto err_release_fw_2;
>
> You forgot to balance rtl_lock_work after the err_release_fw_2 label.
>
> :o/
>
> --
> Ueimor
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists