netdev - Re: [PATCH 1/2] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: sleep in _mv88e6xxx_stats

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150718145830.GA17961@lunn.ch>
Date:	Sat, 18 Jul 2015 16:58:30 +0200
From:	Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:	Guenter <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc:	Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
	David <davem@...emloft.net>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	kernel <kernel@...oirfairelinux.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: sleep in _mv88e6xxx_stats_wait

> Good point. The timeout is most definitely quite large and for sure on
> the safe side. It might make sense to add some statistics gathering to
> see how long the maximum observed delay actually is.

Hi All

Statistics are something which can be used a lot, i bursts and
interactivily. ATU, VTU etc, are much less often used. So different
delays might be justified.

I agree about doing some statistics gathering to determine actual
delays needed.

       Andrew
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html