netdev - Re: [PATCH iproute2] Use PATH_MAX instead of MAXPATHLEN

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAGm1_kv3HJpo_Z=T-qxWupuwOU5F2rO8rSr9HEZZONkch5DO9g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 21 Jul 2015 22:40:32 +0200
From:	Yegor Yefremov <yegorslists@...glemail.com>
To:	Felix Janda <felix.janda@...teo.de>
Cc:	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
	Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH iproute2] Use PATH_MAX instead of MAXPATHLEN

On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 6:52 PM, Felix Janda <felix.janda@...teo.de> wrote:
> Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> On 27/04/15 09:13, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>> > On Sat, 25 Apr 2015 22:33:28 +0200
>> > Felix Janda <felix.janda@...teo.de> wrote:
>> >
>> >> They are equivalent but the former is more common. PATH_MAX is
>> >> specified by POSIX and needs <limits.h> while MAXPATHLEN has BSD
>> >> origin and needs <sys/param.h>.
>> >>
>> >> PATH_MAX has already been in use in misc/lnstat.h.
>> >>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Felix Janda <felix.janda@...teo.de>
>> >
>> > Iproute2 is intended for use on Linux.
>> > It makes more sense to align with Posix than using leftover
>> > BSD stuff. Therefore I don't see any point in doing this.
>>
>> My reading from Felix's commit message is that he is attempting to do
>> exactly that: conform to POSIX rather than BSD, which seems to be the
>> direction you are also suggesting here.
>> --
>> Florian
>
> This is correct. (In fact I misread the end of Stephen's message,
> thought that the patch was merged and wanted to thank for that.)

What's the status of this patch? This is one of the reasons iproute2
cannot be compiled against musl C library. After fixing this I get
tons of redefine errors:

In file included from ../include/linux/xfrm.h:4:0,
                 from xfrm_state.c:31:
../include/linux/in6.h:32:8: error: redefinition of ‘struct in6_addr’
 struct in6_addr {
        ^
In file included from
/home/user/Documents/versioned/buildroot/output/host/usr/arm-buildroot-linux-musleabi/sysroot/usr/include/netdb.h:9:0,
                 from xfrm_state.c:30:
/home/user/Documents/versioned/buildroot/output/host/usr/arm-buildroot-linux-musleabi/sysroot/usr/include/netinet/in.h:24:8:
note: originally defined here
 struct in6_addr
        ^
In file included from ../include/linux/xfrm.h:4:0,
                 from xfrm_state.c:31:
../include/linux/in6.h:40:0: warning: "s6_addr" redefined
 #define s6_addr   in6_u.u6_addr8
 ^
In file included from
/home/user/Documents/versioned/buildroot/output/host/usr/arm-buildroot-linux-musleabi/sysroot/usr/include/netdb.h:9:0,
                 from xfrm_state.c:30:
/home/user/Documents/versioned/buildroot/output/host/usr/arm-buildroot-linux-musleabi/sysroot/usr/include/netinet/in.h:32:0:
note: this is the location of the previous definition
 #define s6_addr __in6_union.__s6_addr
 ^

Yegor
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html