| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 13:22:09 -0700 From: roopa <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com> To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> CC: tgraf@...g.ch, netdev@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] af_mpls: fix undefined reference to ip6_route_output On 7/22/15, 1:04 PM, David Miller wrote: > From: Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch> > Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 21:57:06 +0200 > >> On 07/22/15 at 12:30pm, roopa wrote: >>> diff --git a/net/mpls/Kconfig b/net/mpls/Kconfig >>> index 5c467ef..2b28615 100644 >>> --- a/net/mpls/Kconfig >>> +++ b/net/mpls/Kconfig >>> @@ -24,6 +24,8 @@ config NET_MPLS_GSO >>> >>> config MPLS_ROUTING >>> tristate "MPLS: routing support" >>> + depends on INET >>> + depends on IPV6 >>> ---help--- >>> Add support for forwarding of mpls packets. >> This looks like a much better fix to me and resolves the >> module/built-in dependency mess. > It's only OK if we don't create a new hard dependency on IPV6, > which this patch does. > > Consitently across the tree we give the user the option of > using a bi-AF facility with or without IPV6. yes, ack. I have been trying to avoid that ...also because af_mpls does support a family AF_PACKET mode that should continue to work without CONFIG_INET and CONFIG_INET6 (Though I have not tried it). -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists