netdev - Re: [PATCH v2] cgroup: net_cls: fix false-positive "suspicious RCU usage"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <55AF8761.5020804@iogearbox.net>
Date:	Wed, 22 Jul 2015 14:06:57 +0200
From:	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To:	Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...dex-team.ru>
CC:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
	Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] cgroup: net_cls: fix false-positive "suspicious RCU
 usage"

On 07/22/2015 02:03 PM, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
> On 22.07.2015 14:56, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
>> On 07/22/2015 11:23 AM, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
>>> In dev_queue_xmit() net_cls protected with rcu-bh.
>> ...
>>> Signed-off-by: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...dex-team.ru>
>>> ---
>>>   net/core/netclassid_cgroup.c |    3 ++-
>>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/net/core/netclassid_cgroup.c b/net/core/netclassid_cgroup.c
>>> index 1f2a126f4ffa..6441f47b1a8f 100644
>>> --- a/net/core/netclassid_cgroup.c
>>> +++ b/net/core/netclassid_cgroup.c
>>> @@ -23,7 +23,8 @@ static inline struct cgroup_cls_state
>>> *css_cls_state(struct cgroup_subsys_state
>>>
>>>   struct cgroup_cls_state *task_cls_state(struct task_struct *p)
>>>   {
>>> -    return css_cls_state(task_css(p, net_cls_cgrp_id));
>>> +    return css_cls_state(task_css_check(p, net_cls_cgrp_id,
>>> +                        rcu_read_lock_bh_held()));
>>
>> Did you also check that after your patch this doesn't trigger on ingress
>> either? There, this code path could be invoked under rcu_read_lock(). So,
>> perhaps you need to check for both.
>
> I haven't seen warnings with this patch. rcu_read_lock_held() is
> checked inside rcu_dereference_check() inside task_css_check().

Thanks, agreed.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html