netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH net] sctp: ASCONF-ACK with Unresolvable Address should be sent

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150724191113.GO1730@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Fri, 24 Jul 2015 16:11:13 -0300
From:	Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <mleitner@...hat.com>
To:	Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
Cc:	network dev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net] sctp: ASCONF-ACK with Unresolvable Address
 should be sent

On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 02:56:29PM +0800, Xin Long wrote:
> RFC 5061:
>     This is an opaque integer assigned by the sender to identify each
>     request parameter.  The receiver of the ASCONF Chunk will copy this
>     32-bit value into the ASCONF Response Correlation ID field of the
>     ASCONF-ACK response parameter.  The sender of the ASCONF can use this
>     same value in the ASCONF-ACK to find which request the response is
>     for.  Note that the receiver MUST NOT change this 32-bit value.
> 
>     Address Parameter: TLV
> 
>     This field contains an IPv4 or IPv6 address parameter, as described
>     in Section 3.3.2.1 of [RFC4960].
> 
> ASCONF chunk with Error Cause Indication Parameter (Unresolvable Address)
> should be sent if the Delete IP Address is not part of the association.
> 
>   Endpoint A                           Endpoint B
>   (ESTABLISHED)                        (ESTABLISHED)
> 
>   ASCONF        ----------------->
>   (Delete IP Address)
>                 <-----------------      ASCONF-ACK
>                                         (Unresolvable Address)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
> ---
>  net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c | 12 +++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c b/net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c
> index 06320c8..88d82ef 100644
> --- a/net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c
> +++ b/net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c
> @@ -3090,8 +3090,18 @@ static __be16 sctp_process_asconf_param(struct sctp_association *asoc,

Please let's avoid increasing the indentation level when possible

>  			sctp_assoc_set_primary(asoc, asconf->transport);
>  			sctp_assoc_del_nonprimary_peers(asoc,
>  							asconf->transport);
add a return here

> -		} else
> +		} else {
and remove this else {}
and we're good.

sctp code is often too indented, trying to reduce that bit here and
there.

> +			/* If the address is not part of the association, the
> +			 * ASCONF-ACK with Error Cause Indication Parameter
> +			 * which including cause of Unresolvable Address should
> +			 * be sent.
> +			 */
> +			peer = sctp_assoc_lookup_paddr(asoc, &addr);
> +			if (!peer)
> +				return SCTP_ERROR_DNS_FAILED;
> +
>  			sctp_assoc_del_peer(asoc, &addr);

Here we can replace this call to sctp_assoc_rm_peer() , because if we
already have peer, we don't have to search for it again.

Thanks,
Marcelo

> +		}
>  		break;
>  	case SCTP_PARAM_SET_PRIMARY:
>  		/* ADDIP Section 4.2.4
> -- 
> 2.1.0
> 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html