netdev - Re: [PATCH 03/10] dpaa_eth: add configurable bpool thresholds

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 26 Jul 2015 16:35:20 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	madalin.bucur@...escale.com
Cc:	joe@...ches.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	scottwood@...escale.com, Igal.Liberman@...escale.com,
	ppc@...dchasers.com, pebolle@...cali.nl,
	joakim.tjernlund@...nsmode.se
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/10] dpaa_eth: add configurable bpool thresholds

From: Madalin-Cristian Bucur <madalin.bucur@...escale.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 15:49:39 +0000

>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Joe Perches [mailto:joe@...ches.com]
>> On Wed, 2015-07-22 at 19:16 +0300, Madalin Bucur wrote:
>> > Allow the user to tweak the refill threshold and the total number
>> > of buffers in the buffer pool. The provided values are for one CPU.
>> 
>> Any value in making these module parameters instead?
> 
> I expect one would (hardly ever) change these to improve some corner
> cases then use them with the new values. It may help in the tuning process
> but afterwards the bloat to the bootcmd would probably be  a nuisance.

I think these should be controlled by the existing ethtool infrastructure.

Neither the Kconfig mechanism nor module parameters are appropriate, at all.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html