netdev - Re: [patch net-next 4/4] mlxsw: Introduce Mellanox SwitchX-2 ASIC support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sat, 25 Jul 2015 19:45:07 -0700
From:	Scott Feldman <sfeldma@...il.com>
To:	Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Cc:	Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, idosch@...lanox.com,
	eladr@...lanox.com,
	"ogerlitz@...lanox.com" <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>,
	Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>,
	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
	Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>,
	Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
	john fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
	"simon.horman@...ronome.com" <simon.horman@...ronome.com>,
	John Linville <linville@...driver.com>,
	Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>,
	Shrijeet Mukherjee <shm@...ulusnetworks.com>,
	"nhorman@...driver.com" <nhorman@...driver.com>,
	Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [patch net-next 4/4] mlxsw: Introduce Mellanox SwitchX-2 ASIC support

On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 8:43 AM, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us> wrote:
> From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>
>
> Benefit from the previously introduced Mellanox Switch infrastructure and
> add driver for SwitchX-2 ASIC. Note that this driver is very simple now.
> It implements bare minimum for getting device to work on slow-path.
> Fast-path offload functionality is going to be added soon.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...lanox.com>
> Signed-off-by: Elad Raz <eladr@...lanox.com>

[cut]

> +static netdev_tx_t mlxsw_sx_port_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb,
> +                                     struct net_device *dev)
> +{
> +       struct mlxsw_sx_port *mlxsw_sx_port = netdev_priv(dev);
> +       struct mlxsw_sx *mlxsw_sx = mlxsw_sx_port->mlxsw_sx;
> +       struct mlxsw_sx_port_pcpu_stats *pcpu_stats;
> +       const struct mlxsw_tx_info tx_info = {
> +               .local_port = mlxsw_sx_port->local_port,
> +               .is_emad = false,
> +       };
> +       int err;
> +
> +       if (unlikely(skb_headroom(skb) < MLXSW_TXHDR_LEN)) {

Does this happen at all since dev->hard_header_len was set in probe to
add MLXSW_TXHDR_LEN?

> +               struct sk_buff *skb_new;
> +
> +               skb_new = skb_realloc_headroom(skb, MLXSW_TXHDR_LEN);
> +               dev_kfree_skb_any(skb);
> +               if (!skb_new) {
> +                       this_cpu_inc(mlxsw_sx_port->pcpu_stats->tx_dropped);
> +                       return NETDEV_TX_OK;
> +               }
> +               skb = skb_new;
> +       }
> +       mlxsw_sx_txhdr_construct(skb, &tx_info);
> +       err = mlxsw_core_skb_transmit(mlxsw_sx, skb, &tx_info);
> +       if (err == -EAGAIN)
> +               return NETDEV_TX_BUSY;

I think there is a problem here when returning NETDEV_TX_BUSY when
original skb might have been freed above in the headroom check. (ref
Documentation/networking/driver.txt).

[cut]

> +static int mlxsw_sx_port_dev_addr_get(struct mlxsw_sx_port *mlxsw_sx_port)
> +{
> +       struct mlxsw_sx *mlxsw_sx = mlxsw_sx_port->mlxsw_sx;
> +       struct net_device *dev = mlxsw_sx_port->dev;
> +       char ppad_pl[MLXSW_REG_PPAD_LEN];
> +       int err;
> +
> +       mlxsw_reg_ppad_pack(ppad_pl, false, 0);
> +       err = mlxsw_reg_query(mlxsw_sx->core, MLXSW_REG(ppad), ppad_pl);
> +       if (err)
> +               return err;
> +       mlxsw_reg_ppad_mac_memcpy_from(ppad_pl, dev->dev_addr);
> +       /* The last byte in base mac address is always 0 */
> +       dev->dev_addr[ETH_ALEN - 1] += mlxsw_sx_port->local_port;

If MLXSW_PORT_MAX_PORTS > 256, you'll wrap this.  Is dev_addr[ETH_ALEN
- 2] available to carry into?

> +       return 0;
> +}
> +

[cut]

> +static int mlxsw_sx_port_create(struct mlxsw_sx *mlxsw_sx, u8 local_port)
> +{
> +       struct mlxsw_sx_port *mlxsw_sx_port;
> +       struct net_device *dev;
> +       bool usable;
> +       int err;
> +
> +       dev = alloc_etherdev(sizeof(struct mlxsw_sx_port));
> +       if (!dev)
> +               return -ENOMEM;
> +       mlxsw_sx_port = netdev_priv(dev);
> +       mlxsw_sx_port->dev = dev;
> +       mlxsw_sx_port->mlxsw_sx = mlxsw_sx;
> +       mlxsw_sx_port->local_port = local_port;
> +
> +       mlxsw_sx_port->pcpu_stats =
> +               netdev_alloc_pcpu_stats(struct mlxsw_sx_port_pcpu_stats);
> +       if (!mlxsw_sx_port->pcpu_stats) {
> +               err = -ENOMEM;
> +               goto err_alloc_stats;
> +       }
> +
> +       dev->netdev_ops = &mlxsw_sx_port_netdev_ops;
> +       dev->ethtool_ops = &mlxsw_sx_port_ethtool_ops;
> +       dev->switchdev_ops = &mlxsw_sx_port_switchdev_ops;
> +
> +       err = mlxsw_sx_port_dev_addr_get(mlxsw_sx_port);
> +       if (err) {
> +               dev_err(mlxsw_sx->bus_info->dev, "Port %d: Unable to get port mac address\n",
> +                       mlxsw_sx_port->local_port);
> +               goto err_dev_addr_get;
> +       }
> +
> +       netif_carrier_off(dev);
> +
> +       dev->features |= NETIF_F_NETNS_LOCAL | NETIF_F_LLTX |

Not supposed to use LLTX in new drivers, according to
include/linux/netdev_features.h.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html