netdev - Re: [PATCH 2/3] brcmfmac: dhd_sdio.c: use existing atomic

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 26 Jul 2015 13:12:40 +0200
From:	Arend van Spriel <arend@...adcom.com>
To:	Vineet Gupta <vgupta@...opsys.com>,
	Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
	Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@...opsys.com>
CC:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	<linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Brett Rudley <brudley@...adcom.com>,
	"Franky (Zhenhui) Lin" <frankyl@...adcom.com>,
	Hante Meuleman <meuleman@...adcom.com>,
	Pieter-Paul Giesberts <pieterpg@...adcom.com>,
	Daniel Kim <dekim@...adcom.com>,
	<linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
	<brcm80211-dev-list@...adcom.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] brcmfmac: dhd_sdio.c: use existing atomic_or primitive

On 07/24/2015 07:22 PM, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> On Friday 24 July 2015 08:02 PM, Kalle Valo wrote:
>> Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@...opsys.com> writes:
>>
>>>> There's already a generic implementation so use that instead.
>>>> ---
>>>> I'm not sure if the driver usage of atomic_or?() is correct in terms of
>>>> storage size of @val for 64 bit arches.
>>>>
>>>> Assuming LP64 programming model for linux on say x86_64: atomic_or()
>>>> callers in this driver use long (sana 64 bit) storage and pass it to
>>>> atomic_orr/atomic_or which downcasts it to 32 bits. Is that OK ?
>>>> ---
>>>> Cc: Brett Rudley <brudley@...adcom.com>
>>>> Cc: Arend van Spriel <arend@...adcom.com>
>>>> Cc: "Franky (Zhenhui) Lin" <frankyl@...adcom.com>
>>>> Cc: Hante Meuleman <meuleman@...adcom.com>
>>>> Cc: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
>>>> Cc: Pieter-Paul Giesberts <pieterpg@...adcom.com>
>>>> Cc: Daniel Kim <dekim@...adcom.com>
>>>> Cc: linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org
>>>> Cc: brcm80211-dev-list@...adcom.com
>>>> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
>>>> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
>>>> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
>>>> Cc: linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
>>>> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
>>>> Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@...opsys.com>
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@...opsys.com>
>> What's the plan with this patch? Should I take it to my
>> wireless-drivers-next tree or will someone else take it?
>
>
> Per last discussion on this topic, Arend wanted to discuss abt this with Hante.
> I'm not taking it anyways so feel free to pick it up if you want !

Well, that was before your "timeline" clarification about the generic 
function. One what tree is this patch based?

Regards,
Arend
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html