[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150727185002.GA20334@oracle.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 20:50:02 +0200
From: Sowmini Varadhan <sowmini.varadhan@...cle.com>
To: Cong Wang <cwang@...pensource.com>
Cc: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: netns refcnt leak for kernel accept sock
On (07/27/15 11:37), Cong Wang wrote:
>
> dlm uses a kernel TCP socket too, but it allocates a new socket and calls
> ->accept() by itself. ;)
sure, and rds does this in rds_tcp_accept_one() too.
But the newsk being created in sk_clone_lock is the one on an
incoming syn, i.e., the one that is saved up as part of listen backlog,
to be returned later on the accept.
I dont know the details of dlm- can you have one dlm instance per
network namespace? That's where I'm running into this issue- when we
try to have one rds listen socket per netns, and want to be able to
do both
- dynamically build/tear down new network namepsaces, without
unloading rds_tcp globally
- unload rds_tcp globally withouth tearing down individual netns.
But perhaps we digress.
Fundamental issue remains: newsk is the syn_recv version of the
listen socket. If the listen socket is a "kernel" socket (kern == 1
for sk_alloc, and the listen socket thus has no sk_net_refcnt),
the syn_recv socket must also have that behavior, so that it is
cleaned up in the same way.
--Sowmini
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists