lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55B68E16.1020309@cumulusnetworks.com>
Date:	Mon, 27 Jul 2015 22:01:26 +0200
From:	Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com>
To:	David Ahern <dsa@...ulusnetworks.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	shm@...ulusnetworks.com, roopa@...ulusnetworks.com,
	gospo@...ulusnetworks.com, jtoppins@...ulusnetworks.com,
	ddutt@...ulusnetworks.com, hannes@...essinduktion.org,
	nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com, stephen@...workplumber.org,
	hadi@...atatu.com, ebiederm@...ssion.com, davem@...emloft.net,
	svaidya@...cade.com, mingo@...nel.org, luto@...capital.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 13/16] net: Introduce VRF device driver - v2

On 07/27/2015 08:31 PM, David Ahern wrote:
> This driver borrows heavily from IPvlan and teaming drivers.
> 
> Routing domains (VRF-lite) are created by instantiating a VRF master
> device with an associated table and enslaving all routed interfaces that
> participate in the domain. As part of the enslavement, all connected
> routes for the enslaved devices are moved to the table associated with
> the VRF device. Outgoing sockets must bind to the VRF device to function.
> 
> Standard FIB rules bind the VRF device to tables and regular fib rule
> processing is followed. Routed traffic through the box, is forwarded by
> using the VRF device as the IIF and following the IIF rule to a table
> that is mated with the VRF.
> 
> Example:
> 
>    Create vrf 1:
>      ip link add vrf1 type vrf table 5
>      ip rule add iif vrf1 table 5
>      ip rule add oif vrf1 table 5
>      ip route add table 5 prohibit default
>      ip link set vrf1 up
> 
>    Add interface to vrf 1:
>      ip link set eth1 master vrf1
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shrijeet Mukherjee <shm@...ulusnetworks.com>
> Signed-off-by: David Ahern <dsa@...ulusnetworks.com>
> 
> v2:
> - addressed comments from first RFC
> - significant changes to improve simplicity of implementation
> ---
>  drivers/net/Kconfig  |   7 +
>  drivers/net/Makefile |   1 +
>  drivers/net/vrf.c    | 596 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 604 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/net/vrf.c
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/Kconfig b/drivers/net/Kconfig
> index c18f9e62a9fa..e58468b02987 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/net/Kconfig
> @@ -297,6 +297,13 @@ config NLMON
>  	  diagnostics, etc. This is mostly intended for developers or support
>  	  to debug netlink issues. If unsure, say N.
>  
> +config NET_VRF
> +	tristate "Virtual Routing and Forwarding (Lite)"
> +	depends on IP_MULTIPLE_TABLES && IPV6_MULTIPLE_TABLES
> +	---help---
> +	  This option enables the support for mapping interfaces into VRF's. The
> +	  support enables VRF devices.
> +
>  endif # NET_CORE
>  
>  config SUNGEM_PHY
> diff --git a/drivers/net/Makefile b/drivers/net/Makefile
> index c12cb22478a7..ca16dd689b36 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/net/Makefile
> @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_VIRTIO_NET) += virtio_net.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_VXLAN) += vxlan.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_GENEVE) += geneve.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_NLMON) += nlmon.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_NET_VRF) += vrf.o
>  
>  #
>  # Networking Drivers
> diff --git a/drivers/net/vrf.c b/drivers/net/vrf.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..8669b0f9d749
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/net/vrf.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,596 @@
> +/*
> + * vrf.c: device driver to encapsulate a VRF space
> + *
> + * Copyright (c) 2015 Cumulus Networks
> + *
> + * Based on dummy, team and ipvlan drivers
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
> + * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
> + * (at your option) any later version.
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/netdevice.h>
> +#include <linux/etherdevice.h>
> +#include <linux/ip.h>
> +#include <linux/init.h>
> +#include <linux/moduleparam.h>
> +#include <linux/rtnetlink.h>
> +#include <net/rtnetlink.h>
> +#include <linux/u64_stats_sync.h>
> +#include <linux/hashtable.h>
> +
> +#include <linux/inetdevice.h>
> +#include <net/ip.h>
> +#include <net/ip_fib.h>
> +#include <net/ip6_route.h>
> +#include <net/rtnetlink.h>
> +#include <net/route.h>
> +#include <net/addrconf.h>
> +#include <net/vrf.h>
> +
> +#define DRV_NAME	"vrf"
> +#define DRV_VERSION	"1.0"
> +
> +#define vrf_is_slave(dev)   ((dev)->flags & IFF_SLAVE)
> +#define vrf_is_master(dev)  ((dev)->flags & IFF_MASTER)
> +
> +#define vrf_master_get_rcu(dev) \
> +	((struct net_device *)rcu_dereference(dev->rx_handler_data))
> +
> +struct pcpu_dstats {
> +	u64			tx_pkts;
> +	u64			tx_bytes;
> +	u64			tx_drps;
> +	u64			rx_pkts;
> +	u64			rx_bytes;
> +	struct u64_stats_sync	syncp;
> +};
> +
> +struct slave {
> +	struct list_head	list;
> +	struct net_device	*dev;
> +};
> +
> +struct slave_queue {
> +	spinlock_t		lock; /* lock for slave insert/delete */
^^^^
I don't think you actually need this lock since all VRF dev operations are done
under RTNL so you already got protection against add/del running concurrently.
It would simplify the code if you can get rid of it.

> +	struct list_head	all_slaves;
> +	int			num_slaves;
> +};
> +
> +struct net_vrf {
> +	struct slave_queue	queue;
> +	struct fib_table	*tb;
> +	u32			tb_id;
> +};
> +
> +static bool is_ip_rx_frame(struct sk_buff *skb)
> +{
> +	switch (skb->protocol) {
> +	case htons(ETH_P_IP):
> +	case htons(ETH_P_IPV6):
> +		return true;
> +	}
> +	return false;
> +}
> +
> +/* note: already called with rcu_read_lock */
> +static rx_handler_result_t vrf_handle_frame(struct sk_buff **pskb)
> +{
> +	struct sk_buff *skb = *pskb;
> +
> +	if (is_ip_rx_frame(skb)) {
> +		struct net_device *dev = vrf_master_get_rcu(skb->dev);
> +		struct pcpu_dstats *dstats = this_cpu_ptr(dev->dstats);
> +
> +		u64_stats_update_begin(&dstats->syncp);
> +		dstats->rx_pkts++;
> +		dstats->rx_bytes += skb->len;
> +		u64_stats_update_end(&dstats->syncp);
> +
> +		skb->dev = dev;
> +
> +		return RX_HANDLER_ANOTHER;
> +	}
> +	return RX_HANDLER_PASS;
> +}
> +
> +static struct rtnl_link_stats64 *vrf_get_stats64(struct net_device *dev,
> +						 struct rtnl_link_stats64 *stats)
> +{
> +	int i;
> +
> +	for_each_possible_cpu(i) {
> +		const struct pcpu_dstats *dstats;
> +		u64 tbytes, tpkts, tdrops, rbytes, rpkts;
> +		unsigned int start;
> +
> +		dstats = per_cpu_ptr(dev->dstats, i);
> +		do {
> +			start = u64_stats_fetch_begin_irq(&dstats->syncp);
> +			tbytes = dstats->tx_bytes;
> +			tpkts = dstats->tx_pkts;
> +			tdrops = dstats->tx_drps;
> +			rbytes = dstats->rx_bytes;
> +			rpkts = dstats->rx_pkts;
> +		} while (u64_stats_fetch_retry_irq(&dstats->syncp, start));
> +		stats->tx_bytes += tbytes;
> +		stats->tx_packets += tpkts;
> +		stats->tx_dropped += tdrops;
> +		stats->rx_bytes += rbytes;
> +		stats->rx_packets += rpkts;
> +	}
> +	return stats;
> +}
> +
> +static int vrf_process_v4_outbound(struct sk_buff *skb)
> +{
> +	const struct iphdr *iph = ip_hdr(skb);
> +	struct net_device *dev = skb->dev;
> +	struct net *net = dev_net(dev);
> +	int tb_id = vrf_dev_table(dev);
> +	int err, ret = NET_XMIT_DROP;
> +	struct in_device *in_dev;
> +	struct flowi4 fl4 = {
> +		.flowi4_tos = RT_TOS(iph->tos),
> +		.daddr = iph->daddr,
> +		.saddr = iph->saddr,
> +	};
> +	struct rtable *rth;
> +
> +	struct fib_result res;
> +	struct fib_table *tbl;
> +
> +	rcu_read_lock();
> +	in_dev = __in_dev_get_rcu(dev);
> +	if (!in_dev)
> +		goto out;
> +
> +	if (tb_id == 0)
> +		goto out;
> +
> +	tbl = fib_get_table(net, tb_id);
> +	if (!tbl)
> +		goto out;
> +
> +	res.tclassid    = 0;
> +	res.fi          = NULL;
> +	res.table       = NULL;
> +	if (fib_table_lookup(tbl, &fl4, &res, 0) != 0)
> +		goto out;
> +
> +	dev = FIB_RES_DEV(res);
> +
> +	rth = ip_route_new_rtable(dev, RTCF_LOCAL, res.type,
> +				  IN_DEV_CONF_GET(in_dev, NOPOLICY),
> +				  IN_DEV_CONF_GET(in_dev, NOXFRM),
> +				  true);
> +	if (!rth)
> +		goto out;
> +
> +	ip_route_set_nexthop(rth, fl4.daddr, &res);
> +
> +	skb_dst_drop(skb);
> +	skb_dst_set(skb, &rth->dst);
> +	err = ip_local_out(skb);
> +	if (!net_xmit_eval(err))
> +		ret = NET_XMIT_SUCCESS;
> +
> +out:
> +	rcu_read_unlock();
> +
> +	if (ret != NET_XMIT_SUCCESS)
> +		dev->stats.tx_errors++;
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static netdev_tx_t vrf_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *mdev)
> +{
> +	struct pcpu_dstats *dstats = this_cpu_ptr(mdev->dstats);
> +	unsigned int len = skb->len;
> +	int ret = NET_XMIT_DROP;
> +
> +	if (skb_mac_header_was_set(skb)) {
> +		skb_pull(skb, sizeof(struct ethhdr));
> +		skb->mac_header = (typeof(skb->mac_header))~0U;
> +		skb_reset_network_header(skb);
> +	}
> +
> +	if (skb->protocol == htons(ETH_P_IP))
> +		ret = vrf_process_v4_outbound(skb);
> +
> +	if (ret == NET_XMIT_SUCCESS) {
> +		u64_stats_update_begin(&dstats->syncp);
> +		dstats->tx_pkts++;
> +		dstats->tx_bytes += len;
> +		u64_stats_update_end(&dstats->syncp);
> +	} else {
> +		dstats->tx_drps++;
> +		kfree_skb(skb);
> +	}
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +/**************************** device handling ********************/
> +
> +/* cycle interface to flush neighbor cache and move routes across tables */
> +static void cycle_netdev(struct net_device *dev)
> +{
> +	unsigned int flags = dev->flags;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	if (!netif_running(dev))
> +		return;
> +
> +	ret = dev_change_flags(dev, flags & ~IFF_UP);
> +	if (ret >= 0)
> +		ret = dev_change_flags(dev, flags);
> +
> +	if (ret < 0) {
> +		netdev_err(dev,
> +			   "Failed to cycle device %s; route tables might be wrong!\n",
> +			   dev->name);
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +/* queue->lock must be held */
> +static struct slave *__vrf_find_slave_dev(struct slave_queue *queue,
> +					  struct net_device *dev)
> +{
> +	struct list_head *this, *head;
> +
> +	head = &queue->all_slaves;
> +	list_for_each(this, head) {
^^^^
list_for_each_entry()

> +		struct slave *slave = list_entry(this, struct slave, list);
> +
> +		if (slave->dev == dev)
> +			return slave;
> +	}
> +
> +	return NULL;
> +}
> +
> +/* inverse of __vrf_insert_slave; queue->lock must be held */
> +static void __vrf_remove_slave(struct slave_queue *queue, struct slave *slave)
> +{
> +	dev_put(slave->dev);
> +	list_del(&slave->list);
> +	queue->num_slaves--;
> +}
> +
> +/* queue->lock must be held */
> +static void __vrf_insert_slave(struct slave_queue *queue, struct slave *slave)
> +{
> +	dev_hold(slave->dev);
> +	list_add(&slave->list, &queue->all_slaves);
> +	queue->num_slaves++;
> +}
> +
> +static int do_vrf_add_slave(struct net_device *dev, struct net_device *port_dev)
> +{
> +	struct net_vrf_dev *vrf_ptr = kmalloc(sizeof(*vrf_ptr), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	struct slave *slave = kzalloc(sizeof(*slave), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	struct slave *duplicate_slave;
> +	struct net_vrf *vrf = netdev_priv(dev);
> +	struct slave_queue *queue = &vrf->queue;
> +	int ret = -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	if (!slave || !vrf_ptr)
> +		goto out_fail;
> +
> +	slave->dev = port_dev;
> +
> +	vrf_ptr->ifindex = dev->ifindex;
> +	vrf_ptr->tb_id = vrf->tb_id;
> +
> +	spin_lock_bh(&queue->lock);
> +
> +	duplicate_slave = __vrf_find_slave_dev(queue, port_dev);
> +	if (duplicate_slave) {
> +		spin_unlock_bh(&queue->lock);
> +		ret = -EBUSY;
> +		goto out_fail;
> +	}
> +
> +	__vrf_insert_slave(queue, slave);
> +
> +	spin_unlock_bh(&queue->lock);
> +
> +	/* register the packet handler for slave ports */
> +	ret = netdev_rx_handler_register(port_dev, vrf_handle_frame, dev);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		netdev_err(port_dev,
> +			   "Device %s failed to register rx_handler\n",
> +			   port_dev->name);
> +		goto out_remove;
> +	}
> +
> +	ret = netdev_master_upper_dev_link(port_dev, dev);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		goto out_unregister;
> +
> +	port_dev->flags |= IFF_SLAVE;
> +
> +	rcu_assign_pointer(port_dev->vrf_ptr, vrf_ptr);
> +	cycle_netdev(port_dev);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +
> +out_unregister:
> +	netdev_rx_handler_unregister(port_dev);
> +out_remove:
> +	__vrf_remove_slave(queue, slave);
> +out_fail:
> +	kfree(vrf_ptr);
> +	kfree(slave);
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int vrf_add_slave(struct net_device *dev, struct net_device *port_dev)
> +{
> +	ASSERT_RTNL();
These asserts are not needed, the ndo_slave_add/del always run with rtnl and
many drivers rely on that.

> +
> +	if (!dev || !port_dev || dev_net(dev) != dev_net(port_dev))
> +		return -ENODEV;

I don't think the !dev or !port_dev can happen. Also the net can't be different
looking at do_set_master() in rtnetlink.c

> +
> +	if (!vrf_is_master(dev) || vrf_is_master(port_dev) ||

Hmm, this means that bonds won't be able to be VRF slaves.
They have the IFF_MASTER flag set.

> +	    vrf_is_slave(port_dev))
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	return do_vrf_add_slave(dev, port_dev);
> +}
> +
> +/* inverse of do_vrf_add_slave */
> +static int do_vrf_del_slave(struct net_device *dev, struct net_device *port_dev)
> +{
> +	struct net_vrf *vrf = netdev_priv(dev);
> +	struct slave_queue *queue = &vrf->queue;
> +	struct net_vrf_dev *vrf_ptr = NULL;
> +	struct slave *slave;
> +
> +	vrf_ptr = rcu_dereference(dev->vrf_ptr);
> +	RCU_INIT_POINTER(dev->vrf_ptr, NULL);

I think this isn't safe, you should wait for a grace period before freeing the
pointer. Actually you can just move the kfree() below the netdev_rx_handler_unregister()
since it does synchronize_rcu() anyway.

> +	kfree(vrf_ptr);
> +
> +	netdev_upper_dev_unlink(port_dev, dev);
> +	port_dev->flags &= ~IFF_SLAVE;
> +
> +	netdev_rx_handler_unregister(dev);
> +
> +	cycle_netdev(port_dev);
> +
> +	spin_lock_bh(&queue->lock);
> +
> +	slave = __vrf_find_slave_dev(queue, port_dev);
> +	if (slave)
> +		__vrf_remove_slave(queue, slave);
> +
> +	spin_unlock_bh(&queue->lock);
> +
> +	kfree(slave);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int vrf_del_slave(struct net_device *dev, struct net_device *port_dev)
> +{
> +	ASSERT_RTNL();
> +
> +	if (!dev || !port_dev)
> +		return -ENODEV;
^
I really don't think any of this can happen.

> +
> +	if (!vrf_is_master(dev))
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	return do_vrf_del_slave(dev, port_dev);
> +}
> +
> +static int vrf_dev_init(struct net_device *dev)
> +{
> +	struct net_vrf *vrf = netdev_priv(dev);
> +
> +	spin_lock_init(&vrf->queue.lock);
> +	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&vrf->queue.all_slaves);
> +
> +	dev->dstats = netdev_alloc_pcpu_stats(struct pcpu_dstats);
> +	if (!dev->dstats)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	dev->flags  =  IFF_MASTER | IFF_NOARP;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void vrf_dev_uninit(struct net_device *dev)
> +{
> +	free_percpu(dev->dstats);
> +}
> +
> +static int vrf_dev_close(struct net_device *dev)
> +{
> +	struct net_vrf *vrf = netdev_priv(dev);
> +	struct slave_queue *queue = &vrf->queue;
> +	struct list_head *this, *head;
> +
> +	head = &queue->all_slaves;
> +	list_for_each(this, head) {
^^^
list_for_each_entry()

> +		struct slave *slave = list_entry(this, struct slave, list);
> +
> +		slave->dev->vrf_ptr->ifindex = 0;
> +		slave->dev->vrf_ptr->tb_id = 0;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (dev->flags & IFF_MASTER)
> +		dev->flags &= ~IFF_UP;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int vrf_dev_open(struct net_device *dev)
> +{
> +	struct net_vrf *vrf = netdev_priv(dev);
> +	struct slave_queue *queue = &vrf->queue;
> +	struct list_head *this, *head;
> +
> +	head = &queue->all_slaves;
> +	list_for_each(this, head) {
^^^
list_for_each_entry()

> +		struct slave *slave = list_entry(this, struct slave, list);
> +
> +		slave->dev->vrf_ptr->ifindex = dev->ifindex;
> +		slave->dev->vrf_ptr->tb_id = vrf->tb_id;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (dev->flags & IFF_MASTER)
> +		dev->flags |= IFF_UP;
> +
> +	if (!vrf->tb)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct net_device_ops vrf_netdev_ops = {
> +	.ndo_init		= vrf_dev_init,
> +	.ndo_uninit		= vrf_dev_uninit,
> +	.ndo_open		= vrf_dev_open,
> +	.ndo_stop		= vrf_dev_close,
> +	.ndo_start_xmit		= vrf_xmit,
> +	.ndo_get_stats64	= vrf_get_stats64,
> +	.ndo_add_slave		= vrf_add_slave,
> +	.ndo_del_slave		= vrf_del_slave,
> +};
> +
> +static void vrf_get_drvinfo(struct net_device *dev,
> +			    struct ethtool_drvinfo *info)
> +{
> +	strlcpy(info->driver, DRV_NAME, sizeof(info->driver));
> +	strlcpy(info->version, DRV_VERSION, sizeof(info->version));
> +}
> +
> +static const struct ethtool_ops vrf_ethtool_ops = {
> +	.get_drvinfo	= vrf_get_drvinfo,
> +};
> +
> +static void vrf_setup(struct net_device *dev)
> +{
> +	ether_setup(dev);
> +
> +	/* Initialize the device structure. */
> +	dev->netdev_ops = &vrf_netdev_ops;
> +	dev->ethtool_ops = &vrf_ethtool_ops;
> +	dev->destructor = free_netdev;
> +
> +	/* Fill in device structure with ethernet-generic values. */
> +	eth_hw_addr_random(dev);
> +}
> +
> +static int vrf_validate(struct nlattr *tb[], struct nlattr *data[])
> +{
> +	if (tb[IFLA_ADDRESS]) {
> +		if (nla_len(tb[IFLA_ADDRESS]) != ETH_ALEN)
> +			return -EINVAL;
> +		if (!is_valid_ether_addr(nla_data(tb[IFLA_ADDRESS])))
> +			return -EADDRNOTAVAIL;
> +	}
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int vrf_newlink(struct net *src_net, struct net_device *dev,
> +		       struct nlattr *tb[], struct nlattr *data[])
> +{
> +	struct net_vrf *vrf = netdev_priv(dev);
> +	int err;
> +
> +	if (!data || !data[IFLA_VRF_TABLE])
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	vrf->tb_id = nla_get_u32(data[IFLA_VRF_TABLE]);
> +
> +	/* reserve a table for this VRF device */
> +	err = -ERANGE;
> +	vrf->tb = fib_new_table(dev_net(dev), vrf->tb_id);
> +	if (!vrf->tb)
> +		goto out_fail;
> +
> +	dev->priv_flags |= IFF_VRF_MASTER;
> +
> +	err = -ENOMEM;
> +	dev->vrf_ptr = kmalloc(sizeof(*dev->vrf_ptr), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!dev->vrf_ptr)
> +		goto out_fail;
> +
> +	dev->vrf_ptr->ifindex = dev->ifindex;
> +	dev->vrf_ptr->tb_id = vrf->tb_id;
> +
> +	err = register_netdevice(dev);
> +	if (err < 0)
> +		goto out_fail;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +
> +out_fail:
> +	kfree(dev->vrf_ptr);
> +	free_netdev(dev);
> +	return err;
> +}
> +
> +static void vrf_dellink(struct net_device *dev, struct list_head *head)
> +{
> +	struct net_vrf *vrf = netdev_priv(dev);
> +
> +	kfree(dev->vrf_ptr);
> +	fib_free_table(vrf->tb);
> +}
> +
> +static size_t vrf_nl_getsize(const struct net_device *dev)
> +{
> +	return nla_total_size(sizeof(u32));  /* IFLA_VRF_TABLE */
> +}
> +
> +static int vrf_fillinfo(struct sk_buff *skb,
> +			const struct net_device *dev)
> +{
> +	struct net_vrf *vrf = netdev_priv(dev);
> +
> +	return nla_put_u32(skb, IFLA_VRF_TABLE, vrf->tb_id);
> +}
> +
> +static const struct nla_policy vrf_nl_policy[IFLA_VRF_MAX + 1] = {
> +	[IFLA_VRF_TABLE] = { .type = NLA_U32 },
> +};
> +
> +static struct rtnl_link_ops vrf_link_ops __read_mostly = {
> +	.kind		= DRV_NAME,
> +	.priv_size	= sizeof(struct net_vrf),
> +
> +	.get_size	= vrf_nl_getsize,
> +	.policy		= vrf_nl_policy,
> +	.validate	= vrf_validate,
> +	.fill_info	= vrf_fillinfo,
> +
> +	.newlink	= vrf_newlink,
> +	.dellink	= vrf_dellink,
> +	.setup		= vrf_setup,
> +	.maxtype	= IFLA_VRF_MAX,
> +};
> +
> +static int __init vrf_init_module(void)
> +{
> +	return rtnl_link_register(&vrf_link_ops);
> +}
> +
> +static void __exit vrf_cleanup_module(void)
> +{
> +	rtnl_link_unregister(&vrf_link_ops);
> +}
> +
> +module_init(vrf_init_module);
> +module_exit(vrf_cleanup_module);
> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Shrijeet Mukherjee, David Ahern");
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> +MODULE_ALIAS_RTNL_LINK(DRV_NAME);
> +MODULE_VERSION(DRV_VERSION);
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ