netdev - netns refcnt leak for kernel accept sock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150727142146.GC16447@oracle.com>
Date:	Mon, 27 Jul 2015 16:21:46 +0200
From:	Sowmini Varadhan <sowmini.varadhan@...cle.com>
To:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	ebiederm@...ssion.com, davem@...emloft.net,
	sowmini.varadhan@...cle.com
Subject: netns refcnt leak for kernel accept sock

I'm running into a netns refcnt issue, and I suspect that 
eeb1bd5c has something to do with it (perhaps we need an 
additional change in sk_clone_lock() after eeb1bd5c). 
Here's the problem:

When we create an syn_recv sock based on a kernel listen sock, we
take a get_net() ref  with a stack similar to the one shown below.
Note that the parent (kernel, listen) sock itself has not taken
a get_net() ref, because it explicitly calls sock_create_kern().

  get_net /* for the newsk */
  sk_clone_lock
  inet_csk_clone_lock
  tcp_create_openreq_child
  tcp_v4_syn_recv_sock
  tcp_check_req
  tcp_v4_do_rcv
  tcp_v4_rcv 
   :

But it's not clear to me where this refcnt will be released: 
in my case, I expect to create/cleanup kernel sockets as part 
of ->init/->exit for my module, but because the accept socket 
has a netns refcnt, it blocks cleanup_net(), thus my ->exit 
pernet_subsys op cannot run and clean this up, and we have a leak.

I think that sk_clone_lock() should only do a get_net() if the parent
is not a kernel socket (making this similar to sk_alloc()), i.e.,

diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c
index 08f16db..371d1b7 100644
--- a/net/core/sock.c
+++ b/net/core/sock.c
@@ -1497,7 +1497,8 @@ struct sock *sk_clone_lock(const struct sock *sk, const gf
                sock_copy(newsk, sk);

                /* SANITY */
-               get_net(sock_net(newsk));
+               if (likely(newsk->sk_net_refcnt))
+                       get_net(sock_net(newsk));
                sk_node_init(&newsk->sk_node);
                sock_lock_init(newsk);
                bh_lock_sock(newsk);

Does this sound right?

--Sowmini

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html