[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1438102377.20182.65.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 18:52:57 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: David Ahern <dsa@...ulusnetworks.com>
Cc: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, shm@...ulusnetworks.com,
roopa@...ulusnetworks.com, gospo@...ulusnetworks.com,
jtoppins@...ulusnetworks.com, nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com,
ddutt@...ulusnetworks.com, nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com,
stephen@...workplumber.org, hadi@...atatu.com, davem@...emloft.net,
svaidya@...cade.com, mingo@...nel.org, luto@...capital.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 14/16] net: Add sk_bind_dev_if to task_struct
On Tue, 2015-07-28 at 10:07 -0600, David Ahern wrote:
> Problems with using network namespaces for VRFs has been discussed in
> the past. e.g.,
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg298368.html
Great. Are you suggesting to get rid of network namespaces ?
If not, your proposal only increases bloat and maintenance burden.
If namespaces cant be fixed, they are the wrong design and we should
remove them.
If they can be fixed, they must be fixed.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists