lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <03CA77BA8AF6F1469AEDFBDA1322A7B749FC9CBA@XAP-PVEXMBX02.xlnx.xilinx.com>
Date:	Tue, 28 Jul 2015 03:34:51 +0000
From:	Punnaiah Choudary Kalluri <punnaiah.choudary.kalluri@...inx.com>
To:	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
	Michal Simek <michals@...inx.com>,
	Anirudha Sarangi <anirudh@...inx.com>,
	"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
	"andrew@...n.ch" <andrew@...n.ch>
CC:	Harini Katakam <harinik@...inx.com>,
	"kpc528@...il.com" <kpc528@...il.com>,
	"kalluripunnaiahchoudary@...il.com" 
	<kalluripunnaiahchoudary@...il.com>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [RFC PATCH 0/2] net: macb: Add mdio driver for accessing
 multiple phy devices

Hi Nicolas,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nicolas Ferre [mailto:nicolas.ferre@...el.com]
> Sent: Monday, July 27, 2015 1:07 PM
> To: Michal Simek; Punnaiah Choudary Kalluri; Anirudha Sarangi;
> davem@...emloft.net; Florian Fainelli; andrew@...n.ch
> Cc: Harini Katakam; kpc528@...il.com;
> kalluripunnaiahchoudary@...il.com; netdev@...r.kernel.org; Punnaiah
> Choudary Kalluri
> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] net: macb: Add mdio driver for accessing
> multiple phy devices
> 
> Le 20/07/2015 15:30, Michal Simek a écrit :
> > Hi Nicolas,
> >
> > have you had a time to look at this?
> 
> Michal,
> 
> Sorry for the delay.
> 
> With the insight of Florian and Andrew, I do agree to move to your
> "Implementation 1" and a separate driver for mdio bus.
> 
> The only thing that worries me it that the architecture AVR32 which we
> are sharing this driver with doesn't have support for device tree (and
> may never have). So, it would be good to make sure to keep compatibility
> with it.
> 
> Another point to take into account is the transition period: we have
> several SoC .dtsi/dts that will need to be converted and we'll need to
> add this mdio support before that it's integrated in netdev: we have to
> think about it in advance.

Ok. I will send you updated patch for mdio support soon and we will finalize next
Course of actions if it doesn't break the existing flow. 

Thanks,
Punnaiah
> 
> Thanks, bye.
> 
> 
> > On 07/13/2015 06:48 AM, Punnaiah Choudary Kalluri wrote:
> >> This patch is to add support for the design that has multiple ethernet
> >> mac controllers and single mdio bus connected to multiple phy devices.
> >> i.e mdio lines are connected to any of the ethernet mac controller and
> >> all the phy devices will be accessed using the phy maintenance interface
> >> in that mac controller.
> >>
> >>  ______                   _____
> >> |      |                 |PHY0 |
> >> | MAC0 |-----------------|     |
> >> |______|       |         |_____|
> >>                |
> >>  ______        |          _____
> >> |      |       |         |     |
> >> | MAC1 |       |_________|PHY1 |
> >> |______|                 |____ |
> >>
> >> So, i come up with two implementations for addressing the above
> configuration.
> >>
> >> Implementation 1:
> >>  Have separate driver for mdio bus
> >>  Create a DT node for all the PHY devices connected to the mdio bus
> >>  This driver will share the register space of the mac controller that has
> >>  mdio bus connected.
> >>
> >> Implementation 2:
> >>  Add new property "has-mdio" and it should be 1 for the mac that has
> mdio bus
> >>  connected.
> >>  Create the mdio bus only when the has-mdio property is 1
> >>
> >> Please review the two implementations and suggest which one is better
> to proceed
> >> further. In my opinion implementation 1 will be the ideal one.
> >>
> >> Currently i have tested the patches with single mac and single phy
> >> configuration. I need to take care of few more cases before releasing the
> final patch
> >> but before that i would like to have your opinion on the above
> implementations
> >> and finalize one implementation. so that i can enhance it further.
> >>
> >> Punnaiah Choudary Kalluri (1):
> >>   net: macb: Add mdio driver for accessing multiple phy devices
> >>   net: macb: Add support for single mac managing more than one phy
> >>
> >>
> >>  drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/Makefile    |    2 +-
> >>  drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb.c      |   93 +-------------
> >>  drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb.h      |    3 +-
> >>  drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb_mdio.c |  204
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>  4 files changed, 211 insertions(+), 91 deletions(-)
> >>  create mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb_mdio.c
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 
> --
> Nicolas Ferre
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ